Nemaska Lithium Inc. (TSX:NMX,OTCQX:NMKEF) has provided an update on the bulk sample and modular mill installation at the Whabouchi mine located in the Eeyou Istchee James Bay region, Quebec, Canada. Nemaska Lithium has applied for a Certificate of Authorization to install and operate a new self-contained dense media separation (DMS) modular mill. The modular mill has a processing capacity of 10 t/hour. The Corporation has also decided to increase the mine representative bulk sample from 29,000 t to 60,000 t. This bulk sample will be milled to obtain a 6% Li2O concentrate that will be further processed into lithium hydroxide at Nemaska Lithium’s Phase 1 Plant which is under construction in Shawinigan, Quebec. With the General Certificate of Authorization for the Whabouchi Mine site already in hand, Nemaska Lithium is not anticipating any issues with the ongoing further permitting and has given a mandate for site preparation and installation of the modular mill to Met-Chem Canada, member of the DRA Group. The Corporation is anticipating installation and commissioning of the DMS modular mill to be completed by the end of October 2016 with the mill producing a DMS concentrate over the next 12 to 18 months following the commissioning phase. Part of the DMS material will be further processed through flotation before being shipped to the Phase 1 plant in Shawinigan, Quebec.
“The modular mill is a critical component of our Phase 1 Plant project as it will produce the necessary concentrate that will be further processed into lithium hydroxide samples for customers that are seeking to qualify our products,” said Guy Bourassa, President and CEO of Nemaska Lithium. “With the recent addition of Mr. Francois Godin as VP Operations, I am very confident that this project is in good hands and we will be on track to start shipping mine representative commercial samples of lithium hydroxide to customers including Johnson Matthey Battery Materials by Q1 and Q2 2017.” Bourassa continued, “Qualifying ourselves with customers as a new lithium hydroxide supplier is normal course of business in this industry and is the rationale behind building the Phase 1 Plant and operating the DMS modular mill. This strategy will enable us to more rapidly start realizing revenue from the commercial Hydromet plant which is still on target for commissioning in Q2 2018.”
Connect with Nemaska Lithium Inc. (TSX:NMX,OTCQX:NMKEF) to receive an Investor Presentation.
The post Nemaska Lithium Preps Whabouchi Mine Site for 60,000 t Bulk Sample and Modular Mill Installation appeared first on Investing News Network.
GREENWOOD VILLAGE, COLORADO–(Marketwired – Aug. 12, 2016) – AZARGA URANIUM CORP. (TSX:AZZ)(FRANKFURT:P8AA)(OTC PINK:PWURF) (“Azarga Uranium” or the “Company”) has issued 2,139,715 common shares, as described below, to settle outstanding obligations. The issuance of the common shares to settle outstanding obligations is consistent with the Company’s strategy of preserving cash.
Further to the Company’s news releases on 19 May 2016 and 8 July 2016, the Company has issued:
In addition, the Company has issued 63,579 common shares at a deemed price of C$0.60 per common share to settle insider debts of US$29,699.
The issuance of the common shares is subject to final approval from the Toronto Stock Exchange. Of the common shares issued, 1,229,205 common shares are subject to a hold period expiring on December 13, 2016.
About Azarga Uranium Corp.
Azarga Uranium is a mineral development company that controls six uranium projects, deposits and prospects in the United States of America (South Dakota, Wyoming and Colorado) and the Kyrgyz Republic. The Dewey Burdock Project in South Dakota (the “Project”), which is the Company’s initial development priority, has received its Nuclear Regulatory Commission License and the Company is in the process of completing all other major regulatory permit approvals necessary for operation of the Project, including those from the Environmental Protection Agency and the South Dakota Department of Natural Resources.
Follow us on Twitter at @AzargaUranium.
Disclaimer for Forward-Looking Information
Certain statements in this news release are forward-looking statements, which reflect the expectations of management regarding its disclosure and amendments thereto. Forward-looking statements consist of statements that are not purely historical, including any statements regarding beliefs, plans, expectations or intentions regarding the future. Such statements may include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to the Company’s strategy to preserve cash and the Company’s continued efforts to obtain all major regulatory permit approvals necessary for operation of the Project. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results, performance or developments to differ materially from those contained in the statements. No assurance can be given that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will occur or, if they do occur, what benefits the Company will obtain from them. These forward-looking statements reflect management’s current views and are based on certain expectations, estimates and assumptions, which may prove to be incorrect. A number of risks and uncertainties could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including without limitation: (1) the risk that such statements may prove to be inaccurate and (2) other factors beyond the Company’s control. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this news release and, except as required by applicable securities laws, the Company assumes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements, or to update the reasons why actual results differed from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Additional information about these and other assumptions, risks and uncertainties are set out in the “Risks and Uncertainties” section in the Company’s most recent MD&A filed with Canadian security regulators.
The TSX has not reviewed and does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of the content of this News Release.
The post Azarga Uranium Issues Shares to Settle Obligations appeared first on Investing News Network.
Energy Fuels (TSX:EFR) has announced that it has intercepted several large and high-grade area of mineralization in the next wellfield expected to go into production at its Nichols Ranch ISR Project.
As quoted in the press release:
On August 1, 2016, the Company began delineation drilling and the installation of the wellfield to be associated with Header House 9 at Nichols Ranch. Currently, four rigs are being utilized to drill pilot holes, ream, case, and complete the injection and recovery wells for this wellfield. Header House 9 is expected to begin producing uranium later in 2016.
To date, a total of 52 holes in this new wellfield have been drilled. Of the 52 holes, 46 have encountered mineralization which is above the grade % x thickness (“GT”) cut-off of 0.3. This includes one hole which encountered 5.0 feet of mineralization with an average grade of 2.40% eU3O8. In addition, many of the holes have encountered multiple intercepts above the GT cutoff. It is anticipated that a total of 120 wells will be incorporated into Header House 9.
Click here to read the full press release.
The post Energy Fuels Announces High-Grade Uranium Intercepts at Nichols Ranch appeared first on Investing News Network.
CALGARY, ALBERTA–(Marketwired – Aug. 15, 2016) – Perisson Petroleum Corporation (“Perisson” or the “Company“) (TSX VENTURE:POG) is pleased to announce that it has agreed to an assignment from Forent Energy Ltd. (the “Assignor“) of the right to acquire oil and gas assets in the Ribstone area of Alberta and the Success area of Saskatchewan (the “Acquisition“).
The Acquisition will consist of a 10% interest in McLaren and Sparky oil pools at Ribstone, Alberta, and a 10% interest in a Roseray oil pool at Success, Saskatchewan. The Ribstone and Success pools are not currently producing and have 5 wells and 2 wells respectively on the properties, which were suspended from production due to low oil prices in the last 16 months.
The Alberta Energy Regulator has assigned 6 million barrels of oil in place to the Ribstone pool, and, to date, only 5% of this oil has been recovered. Upon closing of the Acquisition, Perisson will become operator of the properties and intends to improve the operating efficiencies at Ribstone by recompleting one of the existing wells, or by drilling a new well, to provide onsite water disposal and reduce the current operating expenses.
The Assignor has identified 10 future McLaren well locations and 8 Sparky well locations which it believes can be placed on production for less than $15,000/BOE/day. Perisson will evaluate the merits of this proposed program, and proceed with drilling of new wells upon the recovery of oil prices.
The Success project has two existing Roseray wells which require the installation of high-volume bottom hole pumps and the conversion of a third well to water injection as part of the improvement in operating efficiency which is planned by Perisson.
As part of the terms of the Acquisition, Perisson will have the right to acquire a further 40% working interest in both the Ribstone and Success properties, upon evaluation of the results obtained by improving the operating costs or the drilling of additional wells. The acquisition price for the additional 40% working interest will be based on a 20% premium to the original purchase price plus the proportionate 40% share of the remediation expenditures which are to be incurred after Perisson becomes the operator. The Perisson option to acquire this additional interest must be exercised within 120 days of the remediation activities and first production from the existing wells.
About Perisson Petroleum Corporation
On July 21, 2016, Perisson Petroleum Corporation commenced trading on the TSX-V under the symbol “POG”. The Company holds a 100% working interest in 39,927 hectares (almost 100,000 acres) known as the VMM-17 block, a license located in the prolific, stable, oil-producing region of the Middle Magdalena Basin in central Colombia. The Corporation also maintains a beneficial interest in certain oil and gas producing properties (approximately 200 boe/d) in the Twining area of Alberta, Canada. The Corporation’s objectives are to explore, exploit and produce oil from its growing interests in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin as well as the relatively shallow reservoirs believed to be within the VMM-17 block.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This news release includes certain information, with management’s assessment of Perisson’s future plans and operations, and contains forward-looking statements which may include some or all of the following: (i) anticipated production rates; (ii) expected results of capital programs; (iii) expected timelines for production optimization; (iv) net debt levels; (v) anticipated operating costs; and (vi) expected capital projects and associated spending; which are provided to allow investors to better understand the Company’s business. By their nature, forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties; some of which are beyond Perisson’s control, including the impact of general economic conditions, industry conditions, volatility of commodity prices, currency fluctuations, imprecision of reserve estimates, environmental risks, changes in environmental tax and royalty legislation, competition from other industry participants, the lack of availability of qualified personnel or management, stock market volatility and ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources, and other risks and uncertainties described under the heading ‘Risk Factors’ and elsewhere in the Company’s Management Discussion and Analysis and other documents filed with Canadian provincial securities authorities and are available to the public at www.sedar.com. Readers are cautioned that the assumptions used in the preparation of such information, although considered reasonable at the time of preparation, may prove to be imprecise and, as such, undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements. The principal assumptions Perisson has made includes security of land interests; drilling cost stability; finance and debt markets continuing to be receptive to financing the Company, the ability of the Company to monetize non-core assets and industry standard rates of geologic and operational success. Actual results could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. Perisson disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. For more information on the Company, Investors should review the Company’s registered filings which are available at www.sedar.com.
Barrel (“bbl”) of oil equivalent (“boe”) amounts may be misleading particularly if used in isolation. All boe conversions in this report are calculated using a conversion of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one equivalent barrel of oil (6 mcf=1 bbl) and is based on an energy conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the well head.
This news release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of any offer to buy, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful. The securities offered have not been and will not be registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities laws.
Trading in the securities of Perisson Petroleum Corporation should be considered highly speculative. Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
The post Perisson To Acquire Oil Reserves in Ribstone and Success appeared first on Investing News Network.
OTTAWA, ONTARIO–(Marketwired – Aug. 15, 2016) – Everton Resources Inc. (“Everton” or the “Company“) (TSX VENTURE:EVR) is pleased to announce that it has completed the initial field program on its Blue Sky Jackpot Lithium Property in the Thunder Bay Mining District of Ontario approximately 150 kilometers northeast of Thunder Bay.
The purpose of the program was to evaluate historical references to pegmatite outcrops on the Blue Sky Jackpot Lithium Property and to take samples to establish if the referenced pegmatites are lithium bearing.
The program has exceeded expectations and has resulted in a two kilometer trend about 300 meters wide consisting of several distinct outcrop areas individually comprised of pegmatite and spodumene bearing pegmatite. In some cases, the pegmatite outcrops are situated in distinct subcrop trends that infer continuity in excess of 200 meters. Many of these areas have previously been identified by E. G. Pye, 1965, “Geology and Lithium Deposits of the Georgia Lake Area, Thunder Bay District” Geological Report No. 31. The field program encountered all of the outcrops that were reported to exist and visually encountered spodumene where reported historically. Additional several new outcrops of spodumene bearing pegmatite were also encountered. Thirty eight samples of bedrock material have been submitted for analysis to confirm the presence of lithium in the pegmatites.
Everton is also pleased to report acquisition through staking of an additional 720 hectares (four claim groups comprised of 45 claim units) that have been recorded at the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. These claims groups are located to add additional Blue Sky exploration potential to the property.
Everton’s Blue Sky Jackpot Lithium property surrounds the Jackpot Occurrence, a small four claim unit group in the center of the Everton property that is also described by E. G. Pye in his 1965 report as reportedly hosting a historic non-compliant resource of 2 million tons of 1.09% lithium oxide.
Assay results have been submitted on a rush basis results will be released on receipt. If warranted by the results Everton will immediately commence the permitting process to further develop the property. The thrust of additional work will have the immediate goal of assigning continuity and grade to the lithium bearing pegmatites, and will likely take the form of stripping – washing outcrop areas, followed by channel sampling and bulk sampling.
The technical content of this release was reviewed by Wade Kornik, P.Geo., a qualified person as defined by the National Instrument 43-101.
About Everton Resources Inc.
Everton is an exploration company with concessions in the Dominican Republic adjacent to the Pueblo Viejo Mine, owned by the world’s two largest gold mining companies, Barrick Gold Corporation (60%) in partnership with Goldcorp Inc. (40%) (“Goldcorp”). Everton also holds an interest in the Opinaca region of James Bay, Quebec where the Company has partnered with Hecla Mining Company which is advancing Everton’s interest in the Opinaca B project by funding 100% of all exploration work on one of the largest land packages adjacent to Goldcorp’s Eleonore gold deposit. Everton recently announced the acquisition of two properties: the Blue Sky Jackpot lithium property in Ontario and the Detour Lake gold property in Quebec.
For further information on Everton Resources Inc., please visit:
www.evertonresources.com
This news release contains certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of Everton’s plans, objectives, strategies, expectations and intentions. The words “may”, “would”, “could”, “will”, “intend”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “expect” and similar expressions, as they relate to Everton, or its management, are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Many factors could cause Everton’s actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different any future results, performance or achievements that may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included in this press release represent Everton’s views as of the date of the release. While Everton anticipates that subsequent events and developments may cause its views to change, it specifically disclaims any obligation to update these forward-looking statements, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. Accordingly, readers are advised not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to Everton or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this notice.
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
To view the map accompanying this press release, click on the following link: http://media3.marketwire.com/docs/Everton_Resources_aug15_2016_fig01.pdf
The post Everton Resources Exploration Update – Blue Sky Jackpot Lithium Property, Ontario appeared first on Investing News Network.
Uranium One has reported quarterly revenue of $127.3 million for Q2 2016, based on sales of 4.2 million pounds of produced material at an average realized sale price of $1 per pound sold of produced material.
As quoted in the press release:
Q2 2016 Highlights
Operational
- Total attributable production during Q2 2016 was 3.1 million pounds, compared to 3.2 million pounds during Q2 2015.
- The average total cash cost per pound sold of produced material reduced to $11 per pound during Q2 2016, compared to $14 per pound during Q2 2015.
Financial
- Attributable sales volume of produced material for Q2 2016 was 4.2 million pounds sold, compared to 3.2 million pounds sold during Q2 2015.
- Headline revenue was $127.3 million in Q2 2016, compared to $111.0 million in Q2 2015.
- Attributable revenues consistent with the Corporation’s segment reporting amounted to $137.5 million in Q2 2016, compared to$165.0 million in Q2 2015.
- The average realized sales price of produced material during Q2 2016 was $31 per pound, compared to $37 per pound in Q2 2015. The average spot price in Q2 2016 was $27 per pound compared to $37 per pound in Q2 2015.
- Gross profit, including the Corporation’s share of gross profit from equity accounted investees, totaled $50.5 million in Q2 2016, a 23% increase compared to $41.1 million in Q2 2015, mainly due to an increase of 32% in sales volume, partly offset by a decrease of 16% in average realized sales price.
- The net earnings for Q2 2016 were $24.5 million or $0.03 per share, compared to net earnings of $21.6 million or $0.02 per share for Q2 2015.
- The adjusted net earnings for Q2 2016 were $47.8 million or $0.05 per share after exclusion of other income of $9.3 million, inventory valuation adjustment of $21.4 million, impairment of non-current assets of $4.9 million and net foreign exchange loss of$6.3 million, compared to an adjusted net earnings of $7.8 million or $0.01 per share for Q2 2015.
- In addition to the increase in sales volume during the quarter, improved profitability resulted from a reduction in General and Administrative costs and from other cost reduction initiatives.
Click here to read the full press release.
Discover why Bill Gates, Paul Allen and the founder of Greenpeace agree that Uranium is the #1 resource to invest in right now. Click here to access a special INN insider’s report on the uranium investing (value: $49) – For FREE.
The post Uranium One Announces Q2 2016 Production of 3.1 Million Pounds appeared first on Investing News Network.
LAKEWOOD, CO, Aug. 15, 2016 /PRNewswire/ – Energy Fuels Inc. (TSX:EFR,NYSEMKT:UUUU), a leading producer of uranium in the United States, is pleased to announce that it has intercepted several large and high-grade areas of mineralization in the next wellfield expected to go into production at its Nichols Ranch ISR Project (“Nichols Ranch”) in Wyoming, USA. On August 1, 2016, the Company began delineation drilling and the installation of the wellfield to be associated with Header House 9 at Nichols Ranch. Currently, four rigs are being utilized to drill pilot holes, ream, case, and complete the injection and recovery wells for this wellfield. Header House 9 is expected to begin producing uranium later in 2016. The table below contains data for the 10 best holes drilled to date in this wellfield:
Hole Number |
Thickness (feet) |
Avg. Grade (% eU3O8) |
GT* (Grade X Thickness) |
AZ034 |
5.0 |
2.401 |
12.00 |
AV030 |
31.5 |
0.302 |
9.51 |
AY034 |
28.0 |
0.224 |
6.26 |
AX028 |
22.0 |
0.265 |
5.84 |
AU029 |
22.0 |
0.236 |
5.19 |
AV033 |
27.0 |
0.186 |
5.02 |
AW037 |
20.0 |
0.215 |
4.30 |
AW034 |
31.5 |
0.134 |
4.22 |
AZ029B |
11.0 |
0.374 |
4.11 |
AZ033 |
17.0 |
0.239 |
4.06 |
* GT represents grade multiplied by the thickness and is calculated by multiplying eU3O8 grade (in percent) by gamma anomaly thickness (in feet) as determined from down-hole radiometric probing. For example, a drill hole that has 10 feet of 0.10% uranium mineralization has a GT of 1.0 and would be considered a good hole by ISR mining standards.
To date, a total of 52 holes in this new wellfield have been drilled. Of the 52 holes, 46 have encountered mineralization which is above the grade % x thickness (“GT”) cut-off of 0.3. This includes one hole which encountered 5.0 feet of mineralization with an average grade of 2.40% eU3O8. In addition, many of the holes have encountered multiple intercepts above the GT cutoff. It is anticipated that a total of 120 wells will be incorporated into Header House 9.
Stephen P. Antony, President and CEO of Energy Fuels stated: “The drill results we are seeing in the wellfield for Header House 9 at Nichols Ranch are very positive, and the uranium grades and thicknesses are significantly exceeding expectations. Indeed, it is quite rare to encounter mineralization in U.S. ISR projects that have grades above 2.0% U3O8and GT values above 10. Due to the size of the wellfield, expected number of wells, and the quality of mineralization we are encountering, we expect this to be the largest and most productive portion of the wellfield at Nichols Ranch to date. Overall, the Nichols Ranch deposit continues to deliver results that exceed our original expectations. We look forward to producing uranium from this new wellfield beginning later this year.”
Connect with Energy Fuels Inc. (TSX:EFR,NYSEMKT:UUUU) to receive an Investor Presentation.
The post Energy Fuels Announces High-Grade Uranium Intercepts at Nichols Ranch ISR Project appeared first on Investing News Network.
Macarthur Minerals (TSXV:MMS) is pleased to announce that it has entered into an agreement to acquire exclusive rights for two granted exploration licenses (E59/2140 and E59/2077) covering an area of 191 square kilometres (47,161 acres) in the Yalgoo region of Western Australia. The acreage on which rights to lithium are acquired is in proximity to the Company’s existing Edah Hill lithium acreage and consists of granted exploration licenses allowing immediate exploration for lithium.
Previous drilling activities by other companies on the Yalgoo Acreage has intersected buried pegmatites in 14 drill holes and buried pegmatites for up to 3.5 kilometres down strike of previously mapped pegmatites1,2. In addition, within five kilometres of the Yalgoo Acreage, another company’s rockchip samples record significant results for Li2O of up to 1.64% as well as elevated beryllium (Be) (96 ppm), caesium (Cs) (1,840 ppm) and rubidium (Rb) (19,200 ppm)3,4.
David Taplin, President, CEO and Director of Macarthur commented:
“Macarthur Minerals is excited about the acquisition of another lithium project, in the Yalgoo region of Western Australia. In addition, the acreage is granted, allowing for immediate lithium exploration. Historic records indicate that the project is highly prospective for lithium with occurrences of up to 1.64% Li2O on surrounding acreage. The Yalgoo acquisition significantly adds to Macarthur Minerals’ hard rock lithium acreage package, which now exceeds 1,869 square kilometres.”
Connect with Macarthur Minerals (TSXV:MMS) to receive an Investor Presentation.
The post Macarthur Minerals Acquires Lithium Project in Yalgoo Region of Western Australia appeared first on Investing News Network.
Gold prices climbed slightly for the week 0.30 percent, rising sharply Friday morning to $1,352.50 after a significant drop on Thursday. As of 12:41 p.m. EST, gold was down again 0.88 percent, trading at $1,340.33 per ounce.
According to Investing.com, the gold price dropping comes as markets turn their attention to the release of the US economic reports, which are scheduled to be announced later on Friday.
Silver prices also dropped slightly for the week, 0.06 percent overall despite briefly hitting $20.36 on Wednesday. As of 1:00 p.m. EST on Friday, the white metal was trading at $19.72.
Despite the loss, the Economic Calendar reports silver prices are “still on pace for weekly gains after weak Chinese economic data raised expectations for additional stimulus by the People’s Bank later this week.”
Click here to download an INN Industry Report on copper price forecasts, market trends, and predictions – For FREE. Limited time offer. No credit card required.
Looking over to base metals side of things, copper prices also dropped slightly for the week, losing 1.14 percent to trade at $2.15 per pound as of 1:10 p.m. EST. As per Market Realist, the red metal has stayed relatively stable as the market awaits China’s economic data.
“Considering the fact that China accounts for almost half of global copper demand, the economic releases of China will have its impact on the price and demand trends for copper,” the publication reported.
Lastly, spot oil prices were up 2.68 percent for the week despite a slow start and rising sharply on Thursday. As of 1:2o p.m. EST on Friday, oil was trading at $44.29 per barrel.
According to the Financial Times oil’s gains over the last five days are the biggest since April as further speculation indicates the Federal Reserve “will be slow to raise interest rates.”
“The rebound in oil is leading the way, pushing other commodities up in tandem, and that is positive for commodity currencies,”Neil Jones, head of hedge-fund sales at Mizuho Bank Ltd. told the Times. “Demand for these currencies is likely to remain firm given central banks continue to push on the stimulus button.
Don’t forget to follow us @INN_Resource for real-time news updates.
Click here to download an INN Industry Report on copper price forecasts, market trends, and predictions – For FREE. Limited time offer. No credit card required.
Securities Disclosure: I, Jocelyn Aspa, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.
Related reading:
Weekly Round-Up: Gold Drops 2 Percent on Strong US Jobs Data
Weekly Round-Up: Gold Prices Still Rising
Weekly Round-Up: Gold Dips on Stronger Dollar
Weekly Round-Up: Gold Price Takes a Dip
Weekly Round-Up: Gold Price Hits 2-Year High
Weekly Round-Up: Gold Boom
Weekly Round-Up: Gold Price Briefly Tops $1,300
Weekly Round-Up: Gold Boom
Weekly Round-Up: Gold Price Leaps on US Jobs Data
The post Weekly Round-Up: Gold Weakens on US Jobs Data appeared first on Investing News Network.
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA–(Marketwired – Aug. 12, 2016) – Skyharbour Resources Ltd. (TSX VENTURE:SYH)(OTC:SYHBD)(FRANKFURT:SC1N) (the “Company”) is pleased to announce the closing of a non-brokered private placement of $2,468,655 and the Company has been granted exchange acceptance for the option to acquire 100% of Moore Lake uranium project from Denison Mines (TSX: DML).
Further to Skyharbour Resources’ two news releases both dated July 14, 2016, it has closed its non-brokered private placement to raise gross proceeds of CDN $2,468,655. Due to strong response from investors, the Company increased its non-brokered private placement financing to $2,468,655 from the initially targeted $1,950,000. The amended financing will be completed through the issuance of up to 16,457,700 units (the “Units”) at a price of $0.15 per unit. Each Unit consists of one common share and one non-transferable share purchase warrant (“Warrant”), with each whole Warrant entitling the holder to purchase one common share for a period of five years at a price of $0.27 per share.
In connection with the financing, Skyharbour issued a total of 575,169 units to finders (the “Finder’s Units”) who introduced certain subscribers to the private placement. Each Finder’s Unit will entitle the finder to purchase, for a period of two years, a Finder’s Unit on the same terms as the private placement Unit. The Company also paid to finders a cash total of $86,275.35 in connection with this financing. The Unit Shares and Warrants issued under the private placement and any shares issued pursuant to the exercise of the Warrants and Finder’s Units are subject to a four month and one day hold period under applicable securities laws and imposed by the TSX Venture Exchange.
Skyharbour has been granted exchange acceptance, as announced in the July 14, 2016 news release, on securing the option to acquire 100% of Moore Lake uranium project from Denison. The 35,705 hectare Moore Lake Project is an advanced uranium exploration property strategically located in the eastern portion of the Athabasca Basin region, which is known for its large scale and high grade uranium deposits and producing uranium mines. Previous exploration efforts on the property discovered high grade uranium mineralization highlighted by drill hole ML-61, which intersected 4.03% eU3O8 over 10 metres at the Maverick Zone. The depth to the unconformity on the property is relatively shallow and significant additional discovery potential remains over several conductive trends.
As part of the Option Agreement, Skyharbour has issued 4,500,000 common shares to Denison, subject to a four month and one day hold period under applicable securities laws and imposed by the TSX Venture Exchange. Skyharbour will also make staged cash payments over five years totaling $500,000 to Denison as well as incur $3,500,000 in exploration expenditures over five years to complete its acquisition of a 100% interest in the property.
About Skyharbour Resources Ltd.:
Skyharbour holds an extensive portfolio of uranium and thorium exploration projects in Canada’s Athabasca Basin and is well positioned to benefit from improving uranium market fundamentals with five drill-ready projects. In July 2016, Skyharbour acquired an option from Denison Mines to acquire 100% of the Moore Lake Uranium Project which is located 20 kilometres east of Denison’s Wheeler River project and 39 kilometres south of Cameco’s McArthur River mine. Moore Lake is an advanced stage uranium exploration property with over $30 million in historical exploration, 370 drill holes, and a high grade zone known as the Maverick Zone with drill results including 4.03% e U3O8 over 10 metres at a depth of 265 metres. The Company owns a 100% interest in the Falcon Point (formerly Way Lake) Uranium Project on the eastern perimeter of the Basin which hosts an NI 43-101 inferred resource totaling 7.0 million pounds of U3O8 at 0.03% and 5.3 million pounds of ThO2 at 0.023%. The project also hosts a high grade surface showing with up to 68% U3O8 in grab samples from a massive pitchblende vein, the source of which has yet to be discovered. Skyharbour also has a 50% interest in the large, geologically prospective Preston Uranium Project proximal to Fission Uranium’s Triple R deposit as well as NexGen Energy’s Arrow deposit. The Company’s 100% owned Mann Lake Uranium project on the east side of the Basin is strategically located adjacent to the Mann Lake Joint Venture operated by Cameco with partners Denison Mines and AREVA, where high-grade uranium mineralization was recently discovered. Skyharbour’s goal is to maximize shareholder value through new mineral discoveries, committed long-term partnerships, and the advancement of exploration projects in geopolitically favourable jurisdictions.
To find out more about Skyharbour Resources Ltd. (TSX VENTURE:SYH) visit the Company’s website at www.skyharbourltd.com.
SKYHARBOUR RESOURCES LTD.
Jordan Trimble, President and CEO
NEITHER THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE NOR ITS REGULATION SERVICES PROVIDER ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THE CONTENT OF THIS NEWS RELEASE.
This release includes certain statements that may be deemed to be “forward-looking statements”. All statements in this release, other than statements of historical facts, that address events or developments that management of the Company expects, are forward-looking statements. Although management believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results or developments may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements, include market prices, exploration and development successes, continued availability of capital and financing, and general economic, market or business conditions. Please see the public filings of the Company at www.sedar.com for further information.
Discover why Bill Gates, Paul Allen and the founder of Greenpeace agree that Uranium is the #1 resource to invest in right now. Click here to access a special INN insider’s report on the uranium investing (value: $49) – For FREE.
The post Skyharbour Closes Non-Brokered Private Placement of $2.47 Million and Granted Exchange Acceptance for the Option to Acquire 100% of Moore Lake Uranium Project from Denison Mines appeared first on Investing News Network.
The uranium price officially hit an 11-year low on August 5, dwindling back down to $25 a pound where it was in 2005, and even before the 2011 Fukushima disaster. No doubt analysts have been long speculating when the uranium sector will recover from Fukushima, which could still be several years away.
Year-to-date, the uranium price is down 27 percent and hasn’t been able to recover due to the oversupplied market, according to FocusEconomics‘ August 2016 report. While the sector remains bleak, it is expected to improve. The Investing News Network (INN) looked at what analysts are saying about the uranium outlook and what stocks to watch for.
Discover why Bill Gates, Paul Allen and the founder of Greenpeace agree that Uranium is the #1 resource to invest in right now. Click here to access a special INN insider’s report on the uranium investing (value: $49) – For FREE.
In FocusEconomics’ August 2016 report, panelists expect the prices to gradually rise due to an increase in demand from India, Russia and China, with prices averaging $33.20 per pound in the fourth quarter of 2016. Dipping into 2017, panelists expect the price to continue rising to an average of $39.50 by the fourth quarter.
While the price is currently seeing rock bottom prices, it certainly has a long ways to go in just a few short months to rise above the $30 per pound mark.
At the end of July, Cantor Fitzgerald released its 2016 Quarterly Commodity Outlook and noted that the spot uranium price of $27.55 for the Q2 2016 was lower than its estimate of $33 per pound. Rob Chang, senior analyst at Cantor Fitzgerald, noted their expectation that utilities would begin “accumulating uranium for their upcoming uncovered requirements have not materialized.” Chang added the firm has changed its view and expects utilities to focus their buying in the spot market “until they are no longer rewarded with low prices for doing so.”
That being said, Chang wrote that Cantor Fitzgerald believes a”violent increase” for the uranium price is in the cards, but that large global uncovered requirements are large and there cannot be enough available spot market inventory to cover the pending demand.
“In the current low price environment we believe a significant number of uranium mines will shut down once the high priced contracts that have been keeping them operational roll off,” the report reads.
For the foreseeable future, Cantor Fitzgerald expects the uranium price to remain somewhere around $40 per pound due to forecast production shutdowns based on the expiration of long term contracts.
On the other hand, the firm also projected uranium prices of $70 per pound based on the assumption that uranium producers will produce at their forecast production levels, all new uranium projects will start on time and exactly according to their ramp up forecasts.
With both scenarios in mind, however, Cantor Fitzgerald views the first scenario to be the most realistic as “it is unreasonable to assume producers will continue producing at a loss indefinitely.”
However, not all analysts are projecting an upward swing for the uranium sector. The Economic Calendar reported in July that UBS analysts project the uranium spot price to close out 2016 at $30 per pound, down from its previous prediction of $37. Moving ahead to 2017, UBS changed its forecast to $32 per pound, down from $55.
UBS’ reasonings behind their projected low uranium spot prices are due to the fact that Japanese reactor restarts have taken longer than expected, says the Economic Calendar.
Despite this, China currently has 34 nuclear power reactors in operation with 20 under construction, and more on the way, according to data from the World Nuclear Association.
Discover why Bill Gates, Paul Allen and the founder of Greenpeace agree that Uranium is the #1 resource to invest in right now. Click here to access a special INN insider’s report on the uranium investing (value: $49) – For FREE.
While the uranium sector remains bleak, a number of stocks have managed to hold ground during tough times. We looked at a few of the current top stocks within the sector.
Don’t forget to follow us @INN_Resource for real-time news updates!
Securities Disclosure: I, Jocelyn Aspa, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.
The uranium price has trended downward since the 2011 Fukushima disaster, and has hovered below the $40 mark throughout 2015. However, there is a laundry list of major catalysts expected to help move the uranium price in the coming years, and many see a supply deficit in the cards by 2020.
As of September 17, the U3O8 spot price was sitting at US$37.25, unchanged from the previous week. And while the price has moved up only slightly in the past couple of months, analysts believe that’s set to change. With that in mind, the Investing News Network has put together uranium price forecasts from different experts to give investors an idea of what to expect.
Discover why Bill Gates, Paul Allen and the founder of Greenpeace agree that Uranium is the #1 resource to invest in right now. Click here to access a special INN insider’s report on the uranium investing (value: $49) – For FREE.
When Cantor Fitzgerald released its Quarterly Commodity Outlook at the end of July, it noted that in Q2 2015, the uranium spot price came in under its estimate of US$40 per pound, instead hitting US$36.79. At the time, Cantor Fitzgerald Senior Analyst Rob Chang explained that the lower price was mainly due to utilities refraining from both signing contracts and buying.
“The buyers themselves know the prices are going to be a lot higher and they fully see that in the future they are going to pay a lot more — double, maybe even triple. But it is a bureaucracy, they need to get approvals from others, and it’s difficult to justify to the senior board to lock in a contract at US$45, US$50, US$60 when you can just as easily walk into the market right now and buy it for US$36. And they have been right so far,” Chang said, adding that the premise that ample inventory is readily available has also kept buying at bay.
While the firm’s Q2 prediction missed the mark slightly, Cantor Fitzgerald is still firm on its spot price predictions for the next three years, and expects to see the price at US$50 in 2016, US$60 in 2017 and US$70 in 2018. Chang said he expects it will be sales contracts from utilities that move the price in the short term.
“At some point, someone is going to have to jump in and buy and others will do the same — the spot market is so thin that it will show. Just like last year, when a few buyers came in it went from US$28 to the US$40 range really quickly,” he said.
Dundee Capital Markets has a slightly higher outlook for the spot price in 2016, and expects it to reach US$55 per pound. As for 2017 and 2018, the firm expects the price to flatline at $65 per pound. In regards to term volume, which according to Dundee Senior Analyst David Talbot is anything contracted for longer than 12 months, contracts made in 2016 should fall in the $65-per-pound range; for 2015, the firm expects term volume to be $58 per pound.
“Following a contraction below the $10 per pound historical average when spot hit US$44.00 per pound with term flat at US$45.00, the term market reacted with term prices rising to US$49 per pound. Term hasn’t shifted from that level since although spot has settled to reflect a widening of the spread,” Talbot said in a research note. “Term activity has been somewhat slow this year but soon to-be US ISR producer Peninsula Energy (ASX:PEN) negotiated contracts at US$49 per pound in December 2014. With only 80 million pounds term volume over the past two years, we believe that contracting must accelerate to offset the nearly 360 million pounds of uranium used in nuclear reactors over the same period. The 2016-17-18 period sees a tremendous increase in uncovered demand.”
Securities Disclosure: I, Kristen Moran, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.
Related reading:
Major Catalysts Expected to Move the Uranium Price
Athabasca Basin Uranium Companies to Watch
The post Uranium Price Forecast: Going Up? appeared first on Investing News Network.
CALGARY, ALBERTA–(Marketwired – Aug. 10, 2016) –
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO U.S. NEWS WIRE SERVICES OR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES.
Pine Cliff Energy Ltd. (“Pine Cliff” or the “Company“) (TSX:PNE) is pleased to announce that it has completed its semi-annual borrowing base redetermination and has renewed its credit facilities with its banking syndicate of Canadian Financial Institutions (the “Syndicate“). In addition, Pine Cliff has closed a private placement of units (“Units“) for gross proceeds of $30 million (the “Private Placement“). Pine Cliff is also pleased to announce its second quarter financial and operating results. Included in the filings were Pine Cliff’s condensed consolidated interim financial statements and related management’s discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 (the “Q2-Report“). Selected highlights are shown below and should be read in conjunction with the Q2-Report.
Borrowing Base Redetermination
The Company has entered into a Restated Credit Agreement with the Syndicate for an $85 million revolving credit facility, consisting of a $75 million revolving credit facility and a $10 million revolving operating facility (the “Credit Facility“). The Credit Facility has a 364 day revolving period maturing July 28, 2017 and if it is not renewed it will convert to a 1 day term loan due on July 29, 2017. Details of the Credit Facility interest can be found in the Q2-Report. The next date for Pine Cliff’s borrowing base redetermination will be March 31, 2017.
Private Placement
In conjunction with the Credit Facility renewal, Pine Cliff has completed a private placement of an aggregate of 30,000 Units to Alberta Investment Management Corporation (“AIMCo“), on behalf of certain of its clients, at a price of $1,000 per Unit for aggregate gross proceeds of $30 million. Each Unit is comprised of: (i) one promissory note (a “Note“) with a par value of $1,000 per Note and bearing interest at 6.75% per annum, which is payable semi-annually; and (ii) 150 common share purchase warrants (“Warrants“). The proceeds from the Private Placement will be used to reduce the bank indebtedness of the Company.
The Notes mature on September 30, 2020 and all or a portion of the principal amount outstanding thereunder can be repaid without penalty after one year. Pine Cliff issued 4.5 million Warrants in connection with the Private Placement, with each Warrant entitling the holder to purchase one common share of Pine Cliff for $1.38 until August 10, 2018, which reflects a 45% premium to the 10-day weighted average trading price of the common shares of the Company prior to, and including, the date of closing of the Private Placement.
Desjardins Capital Markets acted as financial advisor to Pine Cliff on the Private Placement.
Non-Core Asset Sale Update
The previously announced non-core oil asset sale for gross proceeds of $5.5 million (the “Disposition“) is now anticipated to close on or before August 31, 2016. The proceeds of the Disposition will be used to pay down the Credit Facility.
Second Quarter 2016 Highlights
The second quarter was a difficult quarter for the industry. Pine Cliff continues to pride itself on being one of the lowest cost operators in the industry, but could not avoid having negative funds flow from operations this past quarter. Despite the difficult quarter, Pine Cliff still managed the following highlights:
Outlook
Pine Cliff is proud that it reduced its Syndicate exposure by $100 million since the beginning of the second quarter without an equity issuance. At the same time, Pine Cliff added another strong investment partner, through the Private Placement to AIMCo, that shares Pine Cliff’s long term view on the viability of its business model. On August 31, 2016, Pine Cliff expects its total debt to be approximately $120 million and the bank debt to be approximately $80 million after considering the previously announced $11 million subordinated debt to insiders, the Notes announced today and the proceeds from the Disposition.
As Pine Cliff enters the third quarter, natural gas prices have recovered substantially due to warmer weather and reduced drilling activity. With a corporate break-even gas price of approximately $1.75 per Mcf (before capital expenditures), Pine Cliff is again generating positive funds flow from operations. With one of the highest sensitivities to natural gas prices in the industry and with natural gas demand continuing to increase, Pine Cliff is well positioned to provide shareholders with increased exposure to a rising natural gas pricing environment.
Pine Cliff’s goal has always been to deliver long term value to shareholders by acquiring operated, low decline natural gas assets with long reserve life and low operating costs. The nine acquisitions that it has executed in the last 4.5 years have put the Company in a strong position to achieve this goal. The Company’s focus is the long term generation of free cash flow, and with a corporate production decline rate of approximately 10% and an extensive inventory of drilling locations, Pine Cliff believes in the sustainability of its business model for years to come.
Financial and Operating Results1
($000s, unless otherwise indicated) | Three months ended June 30 | Six months ended June 30 | |||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||
Oil and gas sales (before royalty expense) | 20,695 | 17,333 | 47,925 | 36,112 | |||||
Cash flow from (used in) operating activities | (4,371 | ) | 4,182 | 5,251 | 13,178 | ||||
Funds flow from (used in) operations 2 | (3,655 | ) | 5,555 | (2,257 | ) | 11,737 | |||
Per share – Basic and Diluted ($/share) | (0.01 | ) | 0.02 | (0.01 | ) | 0.05 | |||
Loss | (25,862 | ) | (4,757 | ) | (42,039 | ) | (10,260 | ) | |
Per share – Basic and Diluted ($/share) | (0.08 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.14 | ) | (0.04 | ) | |
Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions | 749 | 447 | 4,366 | 3,333 | |||||
Acquisitions, after adjustments | 240 | 13,304 | 825 | 13,691 | |||||
Capital dispositions, after adjustments | 24,702 | – | 24,702 | – | |||||
Net debt 3 | 122,032 | 38,405 | 122,032 | 38,405 | |||||
Production (Boe/d) | 22,647 | 11,814 | 22,971 | 11,918 | |||||
Percent natural gas (%) | 92 | 95 | 92 | 95 | |||||
Combined sales price ($/Boe) | 10.04 | 16.12 | 11.46 | 16.74 | |||||
Operating netback ($/Boe) 4 | (0.02 | ) | 7.08 | 1.35 | 7.21 | ||||
Corporate netback ($/Boe) 5 | (1.76 | ) | 5.19 | (0.54 | ) | 5.46 | |||
1 Includes results for acquisitions and excludes results for dispositions from the closing dates. | |||||||||
2 Funds flow from (used in) operations is a non-IFRS measure that represents the total of funds provided by operating activities, before adjusting for changes in non-cash working capital. | |||||||||
3 Net debt is a non-IFRS measure calculated as the sum of bank debt and trade and other payables less trade and other receivables, cash, prepaid expenses and deposits and investments. | |||||||||
4 Operating netback is a non-IFRS measure calculated as the Company’s oil and gas sales, less royalties and operating expenses, averaged over the Boe production of the Company. | |||||||||
5 Corporate netback is a non-IFRS measure calculated as the Company’s operating netback, less general and administrative expenses, interest and bank charges plus finance and dividend income, averaged over the Boe production of the Company. | |||||||||
About Pine Cliff
Pine Cliff is a natural gas company with a long-term view of creating shareholder value. Pine Cliff’s current focus is on acquiring long life assets that are cash flow positive in a low commodity price environment. Further information relating to Pine Cliff, including the Q2 Report, may be found on www.sedar.com as well as on Pine Cliff’s website at www.pinecliffenergy.com. To request a hard copy, free of charge, please send an email to info@pinecliffenergy.com.
About Alberta Investment Management Corporation
Alberta Investment Management Corporation, AIMCo, is one of Canada’s largest and most diversified institutional investment manager with more than $90 billion of assets under management. AIMCo was established on January 1, 2008 with a mandate to provide superior long-term investment results for its clients. AIMCo operates at arms-length from the Government of Alberta and invests globally on behalf of 31 pension, endowment and government funds in the Province of Alberta. For more information on AIMCo please visit www.aimco.alberta.ca.
Cautionary Statements
Certain statements contained in this news release include statements which contain words such as “anticipate”, “could”, “should”, “expect”, “seek”, “may”, “intend”, “likely”, “will”, “believe” and similar expressions, statements relating to matters that are not historical facts, and such statements of our beliefs, intentions and expectations about development, results and events which will or may occur in the future, constitute “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and are based on certain assumptions and analysis made by us derived from our experience and perceptions. In particular, this news release includes, but is not limited to: oil and natural gas prices; oil and gas supply and demand; expansion and other development trends of the oil and natural gas industry; business strategy and outlook; expansion and growth of our business and operations; maintenance of existing customer, supplier and partner relationships; supply channels; accounting policies; credit risks; break-even point;anticipated use of the net proceeds of the Disposition and the anticipated closing date of the Disposition; estimated approximate bank debt and estimated approximate total debt. The foregoing statements assume all the conditions, including applicable regulatory approvals and to completion of the Disposition will be satisfied. There is no assurance that all of the conditions to the Disposition will be met and therefore there is a risk that the Disposition will not be completed in the form described above or at all. In the event the Disposition does not close as presently anticipated, Pine Cliff will not realize the anticipated benefits of the Disposition. As such, many factors could cause the performance or achievement of Pine Cliff to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements that may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Because of the risks, uncertainties and assumptions contained herein, readers should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
All such forward-looking information is based on certain assumptions and analyses made by us in light of management’s experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors believed to be appropriate in the circumstances. The risks, uncertainties, and assumptions are difficult to predict and may affect operations, and may include, without limitation: foreign exchange fluctuations; equipment and labour shortages and inflationary costs; general economic conditions; industry conditions; changes in applicable environmental, taxation and other laws and regulations as well as how such laws and regulations are interpreted and enforced; the ability of oil and natural gas companies to raise capital; the effect of weather conditions on operations and facilities; the existence of operating risks; volatility of oil and natural gas prices; oil and gas product supply and demand; risks inherent in the ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to meet current and future obligations; increased competition; stock market volatility; opportunities available to or pursued by Pine Cliff; and other factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s control. The foregoing factors are not exhaustive.
Actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, this forward-looking information and, accordingly, no assurance can be given that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking information will transpire or occur, or if any of them do, what benefits will be derived there from. Except as required by law, Pine Cliff disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Certain information contained herein is based on Pine Cliff internal estimates. Although Pine Cliff believes such information is accurate and reliable, at this time such information has not been verified by any independent sources and Pine Cliff does not make any representations as to the accuracy of such estimates.
The forward-looking information contained in this release is expressly qualified by this cautionary statement.
The post Pine Cliff Energy Ltd. Announces the Conclusion of the Borrowing Base Redetermination, Closing of a Private Placement and Second Quarter 2016 Results appeared first on Investing News Network.
CALGARY, ALBERTA–(Marketwired – Aug. 11, 2016) – Further to the announcement dated August 10, 2016, Bacanora Minerals Ltd. (TSX VENTURE:BCN)(AIM:BCN), the AIM and TSX Venture Exchange listed lithium and borates company focussed on Mexico, announces that it has obtained an amended interim order from the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench to postpone its upcoming annual and special meeting of its shareholders from August 15, 2016 to 10:00 a.m. (Calgary time) on September 28, 2016 at the offices of Gowling (WLG) Canada LLP at 1600, 421 – 7 Avenue SW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
The Company intends to post to shareholders shortly an addendum to the management information circular of the Company dated July 11, 2016 and an amended form of proxy for voting at the postponed meeting.
ABOUT BACANORA:
Bacanora is a Canadian and London listed minerals explorer (TSX VENTURE:BCN)(AIM:BCN). The Company explores and develops industrial mineral projects, with a primary focus on lithium and borates. The Company’s operations are based in Hermosillo in northern Mexico and it currently has two significant projects under development in the state of Sonora. The two main assets of Bacanora are:
Reader Advisory
Except for statements of historical fact, this news release contains certain “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities law. Forward-looking information is frequently characterized by words such as “plan”, “expect”, “project”, “intend”, “believe”, “anticipate”, “estimate” and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions “may” or “will” occur. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking information are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. We cannot guarantee future results, performance or achievements. Consequently, there is no representation that the actual results achieved will be the same, in whole or in part, as those set out in the forward-looking information.
Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date the statements are made, and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking information. Some of the risks and other factors that could cause the results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking information include, but are not limited to: commodity price volatility; general economic conditions in Canada, the United States, Mexico and globally; industry conditions, governmental regulation, including environmental regulation; unanticipated operating events or performance; failure to obtain industry partner and other third party consents and approvals, if and when required; the availability of capital on acceptable terms; the need to obtain required approvals from regulatory authorities; stock market volatility; competition for, among other things, capital, skilled personnel and supplies; changes in tax laws; and the other risk factors disclosed under our profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Readers are cautioned that this list of risk factors should not be construed as exhaustive.
The forward-looking information contained in this news release is expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. We undertake no duty to update any of the forward-looking information to conform such information to actual results or to changes in our expectations except as otherwise required by applicable securities legislation. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information.
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
The post Bacanora Confirms Postponement of Its August 15, 2016 Annual and Special Meeting appeared first on Investing News Network.
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA–(Marketwired – Aug. 11, 2016) – Lithium Americas Corp. (the “Company” or “LAC”) (TSX:LAC)(OTCQX:LACDF) is pleased to announce the appointment of Myron Manternach as Executive Vice President, Finance and Corporate Development, effective immediately.
Mr. Manternach has over 20 years of experience in corporate finance, mergers and acquisitions, and investment management. He worked as an investment banker at JPMorgan Chase & Co. and as an analyst and manager of global alternative investment funds with significant experience in natural resources and emerging market credit and equity. Most recently he was a Managing Director and Senior Portfolio Manager of Ambac Assurance Corp., a subsidiary of Ambac Financial Group. He is chairman of Wellgreen Platinum Ltd. and was previously a director of Lithium Americas Corp. prior to its merger with Western Lithium. Mr. Manternach holds a BS degree in Electrical Engineering with distinction from Iowa State University and an MBA from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
In March of this year, Lithium Americas announced a joint venture to develop the Cauchari-Olaroz lithium project in the Jujuy province of Argentina with Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (“SQM”). Discussions with financial advisors and a wide range of potential investors have commenced and various financing paths are being explored. Among other duties, Mr. Manternach is expected to represent LAC in these upcoming financing discussions.
Tom Hodgson, Chief Executive Officer of LAC, commented. “We welcome Myron to the senior executive team at LAC. We have known Myron for years, and his skill set, experience and network of global relationships is perfectly suited to make an immediate contribution to our JV team on financing related matters. The Cauchari project is on the eve of representing significant employment and investment into the province of Jujuy that will benefit the province for generations, and Myron’s appointment is an important commitment to that effort.”
About the Company
The Company is developing the Cauchari-Olaroz lithium project, located in Jujuy province, Argentina, and the Lithium Nevada project (formerly Kings Valley project) in Nevada, USA, with the intent to become a major supplier of lithium products. In addition, Lithium Americas is a supplier of specialty drilling additives, Hectatone™ and other organoclay products for the oil and gas and other industries.
Forward-looking statements
Statements in this release that are forward-looking information are subject to various risks and uncertainties concerning the specific factors disclosed here and elsewhere in the company’s periodic filings with Canadian securities regulators. When used in this document, the words such as “explore,” “believe”, “intent” and similar expressions is forward-looking information. Information provided in this document is necessarily summarized and may not contain all available material information.
All such forward-looking information and statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by Lithium Americas management in light of their experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors management believes are appropriate in the circumstances. These statements, however, are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking information or statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements include those described under the heading “Risks Factors” in the Lithium America’s most recently filed Annual Information Form. The Company does not intend, and expressly disclaims any obligation to, update or revise the forward-looking information contained in this news release, except as required by law. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information or statements.
The post Lithium Americas Announces the Appointment of Executive Vice President, Finance and Corporate Development appeared first on Investing News Network.
TORONTO, ONTARIO–(Marketwired – Aug. 11, 2016) – Appia Energy Corp. (the “Company” or “Appia“) (CSE:API) is pleased to announce that it has engaged Palisade Global Investments Ltd., (“Palisade“) for a period of eighteen (18) months to serve as advisory consultants to Appia in the United States, Canada and Europe.
About Palisade Global Investments Ltd.
Palisade Global is an offshore merchant bank and has extensive experience in creating effective strategies and introducing its clients to financial market participants including high net worth individuals, retail brokers, analysts, private equity funds and alternative financing groups, primarily increasing exposure and attracting new shareholders as well as making introductions for future rounds of equity financing. Palisade works through direct meetings, conference calls, newsletter writers, email dissemination of the Company’s news, and assists in the corporate presentation materials. Palisade has staff in major locations in North America and in Europe to facilitate the organization of corporate presentations in each locale.
About Appia
Appia is a Canadian publicly-traded company in the uranium and rare earth sectors. The company has NI 43-101 compliant resources of 8.0 M lbs U3O8 and 70.8 M lbs REO Indicated, and 47.7 M lbs U3O8 and 197.6 M lbs REO Inferred in the Elliot Lake, ON, historic mining camp. The resources are largely unconstrained along strike and down dip.
The company is also focusing on discovering high-grade uranium in the prolific Athabasca Basin on its recently acquired properties, “Otherside” and “Loranger”, as well as delineating high-grade REO’s and uranium on its Alces Lake joint venture. The company controls exploration rights on about 84,000 hectares in Saskatchewan.
Appia’s technical team is directed by James Sykes, who has had direct and indirect involvement with over 350 M lbs. U3O8 being discovered in five deposits in the Athabasca Basin.
Appia currently has 43.0 million common shares outstanding, 46.0 million shares fully diluted.
The technical content concerning the property in this news release was reviewed and approved by Thomas Skimming, P.Eng, a Director of Appia, and a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101.
Neither the Canadian Securities Exchange nor its Market Regulator (as that term is defined in the policies of the CSE) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
Appia Energy Corp.
Frank van de Water
Chief Financial Officer and Director
416-546-2707
416-218-9772 (FAX)
fvandewater@rogers.com
Discover why Bill Gates, Paul Allen and the founder of Greenpeace agree that Uranium is the #1 resource to invest in right now. Click here to access a special INN insider’s report on the uranium investing (value: $49) – For FREE.
The post Appia Engages Palisade Global Investments Ltd. appeared first on Investing News Network.
NexGen Energy (TSX:NXE) has reported the discovery of a new high grade zone of mineralization 4.7 km northeast of the Arrow Deposit as part of its on-going summer drilling program on its 100 percent owned Rook I property in the Athabasca Basin.
As quoted in the press release:
Regional drilling approximately 4.7 km northeast of Arrow has resulted in a new discovery of high grade uranium mineralization. Discovery hole HP-16-08 intersected 17.0 m of continuous mineralization (220.0 to 237.0 m) including 4.5 m of off-scale radioactivity (>10,000 to >61,000 cps). This new zone has been named the Harpoon Discovery and is defined by the presence of strong visible uranium mineralization and includes dense accumulations of massive to semi-massive pitchblende mineralization. The discovery hole was a 250 m step-out along trend to the northeast of hole HP-16-06 (also reported in this news release), which encountered 1.5 m of continuous mineralization (<500 to 2200 cps) from 303.0 to 304.5 m. The Harpoon Discovery is on land and starts at a vertical depth of approximately 210 m.
In addition, uranium occurrences between Arrow and along trend to the northeast at Harpoon have now been traced over a mineralized strike length of 5.6 km all within the Rook I property.
Radioactivity results for the discovery hole and three other holes drilled in the same area are included in this press release. The area was first drilled in the summer of 2015 with four holes (see news release dated September 22, 2015).
Highlights:
Harpoon Discovery
- Drill hole HP-16-08 intersected 17.0 m of continuous mineralization (220.0 to 237.0 m) including 4.5 m of off-scale radioactivity (>10,000 to >61,000 cps) and dense accumulations of massive to semi-massive pitchblende with maximum radioactivity exceeding 61,000 cps.
- HP-16-06 intersected 1.5 m of continuous mineralization (<500 to 2200 cps) from 303.0 to 304.5 m, and is located 250 m to the southwest of HP-16-08 towards the Arrow Deposit.
- The Harpoon Discovery is located on a Rook I internal mineral disposition (northeast of green dashed line in Figure 1) which is subject to a 2% net smelter return royalty (the “NSR”) of which 1% can be repurchased by the Company for $1 million which is held by Advanced Royalty Corp. In addition, Harpoon is subject to a 10% production carried interest held by Rio Tinto Uranium Corporation (“Rio Tinto”) which provides Rio Tinto with a right to 10% of potential future production provided Rio Tinto pays NexGen their 10% pro rata portion of the collective expenditure from June 20, 2005.
Click here to read the full press release.
The post NexGen Makes New High Grade Discovery appeared first on Investing News Network.
American Manganese Inc. (TSXV:AMY; PINKS:AMYZF;FRANK:2AM) intends to complete a non-brokered private placement for gross proceeds of up to $1-million by way of a unit offering at a price of 14 cents per unit. Each unit will consist of one common share of AMI and one common share purchase warrant. Each warrant will be exercisable for one common share at a price of 20 cents per common share for a period of two years from the date of closing of the offering.
The proceeds will be primarily used to continue metallurgical testing of the company’s proprietary hydrometallurgical process for large-scale recycling of lithium-ion vehicle batteries, debt settlement and working capital.
Connect with American Manganese Inc. (TSXV:AMY; PINKS:AMYZF;FRANK:2AM) to receive an Investor Presentation.
The post American Manganese Announces $1,000,000 Private Placement appeared first on Investing News Network.
THUNDER BAY, ONTARIO–(Marketwired – Aug. 10, 2016) – Alset Energy Corp. (TSX VENTURE:ION) (“Alset” or “the Company”) is pleased to announce the appointment of Mr. Timothy S. Oliver, PE, P.Eng. as President and Chief Executive Officer of Alset Energy Corp. In addition, Mr. Oliver will be joining the Board of Directors. Mr. Stephen Stares will step down as the current President and CEO in order to focus his efforts as President and CEO of Benton Resources Inc. but will remain a director of the Company.
As previously announced (see Alset PR May 26, 2016), Mr. Oliver has extensive experience not only in Mexico but also in the lithium space having served as VP of Project Development for Lithium X Energy Corp. until February of this year.
Stephen Stares, co-founder and outgoing President and CEO stated, “Tim initially joined our team to lead the Mexican Lithium Salar project development. His vast experience, perspective and ability to quickly assess and analyze the project was quite apparent and it was clear that Tim possessed the necessary skills to lead Alset moving forward. Tim’s extensive and multifaceted career in mining as well as his experience with lithium brines makes him an ideal CEO for Alset and we feel very fortunate that he has agreed to assume this role. We feel confident that Alset is in good hands and are excited for Tim to lead us to success in the future.”
Tim Oliver commented, “I am thrilled to assume this leadership position at Alset. Given both my passion for the lithium space and my experience operating in Mexico, developing a completely new lithium brine district in the Central Mexican Plateau is an exciting prospect. The promise of potash production adds further potential shareholder value given the current lack of domestic supply in Mexico. In addition, the spodumene-rich Wisa Lake lithium project has significant potential and a targeted shallow diamond drill program should allow us to not only start delineating tonnage on the original showing but begin to present a third dimension to the other lithium-rich zones as well. Stephen and his team have done a tremendous job acquiring very attractive assets in Alset thus far and I look forward to strategically advancing these prospects towards development in the future.”
Pursuant to Mr. Oliver’s appointment to the Board of Directors of the Company, Mr. Michael Stares has resigned from the Board and will remain in an advisory role with the Company. Mr. Stares has been instrumental as a director of the Company since its inception. Alset would like to thank Michael for his past service and wishes him success in the future.
Alset is well funded and recently announced a non-brokered private placement to raise up to $2 million (see PR July 29, 2016).
On behalf of the Board of Directors of Alset Energy Corp,
Stephen Stares, President
THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE HAS NOT REVIEWED AND DOES NOT ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE.
The information contained herein contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. Forward-looking statements relate to information that is based on assumptions of management, forecasts of future results, and estimates of amounts not yet determinable. Any statements that express predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be “forward-looking statements”.
Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual events or results to differ from those reflected in the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation: risks related to failure to obtain adequate financing on a timely basis and on acceptable terms; risks related to the outcome of legal proceedings; political and regulatory risks associated with mining and exploration; risks related to the maintenance of stock exchange listings; risks related to environmental regulation and liability; the potential for delays in exploration or development activities or the completion of feasibility studies; the uncertainty of profitability; risks and uncertainties relating to the interpretation of drill results, the geology, grade and continuity of mineral deposits; risks related to the inherent uncertainty of production and cost estimates and the potential for unexpected costs and expenses; results of prefeasibility and feasibility studies, and the possibility that future exploration, development or mining results will not be consistent with the Company’s expectations; risks related to gold price and other commodity price fluctuations; and other risks and uncertainties related to the Company’s prospects, properties and business detailed elsewhere in the Company’s disclosure record. Should one or more of these risks and uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described in forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned against attributing undue certainty to forward-looking statements. These forward looking statements are made as of the date hereof and the Company does not assume any obligation to update or revise them to reflect new events or circumstances. Actual events or results could differ materially from the Company’s expectations or projections.
The post Alset Appoints Tim Oliver as New President and CEO appeared first on Investing News Network.
VANCOUVER, British Columbia, Aug. 09, 2016 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Pure Energy Minerals Limited (TSX-V:PE) (FRANKFURT:A111EG) (OTCQB:HMGLF) (the “Company” or “Pure Energy”) is pleased to provide an update regarding its Mini-Pilot Plant work with Tenova Bateman Technologies (TBT) at their research and development centre in Katzrin, Israel and at other off-site locations. The Pure Energy and TBT team has achieved several intermediate milestones on the preliminary process engineering work for the Clayton Valley South (CVS) lithium brine project:
The CVS Mini-Pilot Plant program is beyond its halfway point and progress has been excellent. This larger scale study of Pure Energy’s proposed processing technology route for the CVS Project is on track to highlight the advantages of a real-time new technology approach to lithium recovery. The team is advancing simultaneously on several areas of the program, as described in more detail below. All of these data will be integrated into the process design flow sheet and engineering studies that will comprise the Company’s forthcoming Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA).
Patrick Highsmith, Pure Energy Minerals CEO commented, “We are very excited by our progress with Tenova Bateman Technologies on the Mini-Pilot Plant. Last year’s preliminary test results showed the solvent extraction technology to be viable at bench-scale, and this work is confirming success at a much larger scale while also providing engineering design data. As we reported in April of this year, the brine from our CVS Project has among the lowest magnesium contents of any lithium brine resource in the world. This makes it well suited for new direct lithium extraction technology, such as the TBT process. We look forward to building on this interim technical success to highlight its potential for low-cost, highly sustainable and environmentally friendly lithium production technology.”
Pure Energy’s proposed lithium recovery process consists of four main stages, as discussed below.
Pre-Treatment – The primary purpose of the pre-treatment stage is to remove alkaline earth elements (Ca, Mg and Sr) using either membranes (LiP™; TBT’s process, being tested in Katzrin) or via direct chemical precipitation (being tested at SGS Canada Inc.’s hydrometallurgy laboratory in Lakefield, Ontario). TBT has completed the initial phase of membrane selection, which consisted of testing eight potentially suitable membranes using a flat-sheet configuration test rig. After analysis of brine flux rates, lithium recovery and alkaline earth rejection, the team selected the two best-performing membranes. These two membranes are currently being tested in a larger, spiral-wound test rig using 6.4 cm (2.5 inch) diameter units. This phase of work entails passing approximately 200 L of brine solution through the membranes in each test run. Work is ongoing, but preliminary data suggest that the membranes are providing better than expected performance in terms of lithium recovery and alkaline earth element rejection.
In addition, work completed at SGS has shown promising results using conventional direct chemical precipitation of unwanted alkaline earth impurities, by raising the pH through addition of sodium hydroxide and soda ash. The work completed to date has demonstrated rapid removal of Mg, Ca and Sr, with effectively zero loss of lithium during this precipitation process. Test work continues at SGS on solid-liquid separation and other aspects of the chemical precipitation option.
Solvent Extraction – This stage takes the pre-treated lithium brine and uses solvent extraction technology (LiSX™) to selectively extract lithium from the brine into the organic phase. That organic is then chemically scrubbed to remove co-loaded impurities and then stripped to produce a concentrated high-purity lithium sulphate solution. Testing at TBT’s mini-pilot facility has focused on optimizing several aspects of the proven solvent extraction technique. The plant operators are employing their 40 mm (1.6 inch) diameter columns to determine and optimize the chemical conditions needed to gain maximum transfer of the lithium from the brine into the solvent, while they utilize their 100 mm (4 inch) diameter columns to assess and optimize the hydraulics of the transfer process. Initial results from the mini-pilot plant are very encouraging, showing that the transfer of lithium from the brine into the solvent is highly efficient, and that the ‘waste’ brine (which is otherwise chemically unchanged) contains near zero residual lithium. These results confirm the favorable LiSX™ results reported from the bench-scale testing in April 2015. Test work is ongoing to define and optimize the scrubbing and stripping of lithium from the Li-rich solvent to make a high purity lithium sulphate solution. This is being performed in the same test column apparatus.
Electrolysis – An electrochemical cell converts the lithium sulphate solution into a concentrated high-purity lithium hydroxide solution (LiEL™). This stage of process test work was completed at a dedicated testing facility with specialty expertise in electrolysis. The work assessed two possible membranes for use in the cell, and examined a wide range of electrical, chemical and physical conditions in order to optimize lithium hydroxide production. Initial data from the testing work show that very high current efficiencies were achieved operating at high current densities during the successful conversion of lithium sulphate into lithium hydroxide. This should translate to smaller equipment needed at full-scale, and result in lower than expected capital and operating costs for this part of the process, though this is still subject to confirmation in the PEA.
Crystallisation – The final stage of the process is to concentrate the lithium hydroxide solution in order to crystallize out a high purity lithium hydroxide solid product. This part of the mini-pilot testing is being completed at a dedicated testing facility in Plainfield, IL. Test work is underway and should be completed in the next several weeks, with results also being incorporated into the PEA.
Data and knowledge derived from the completed Mini-Pilot Plant will be integrated by Pure Energy’s engineering team into estimates of capital (CAPEX) and operating (OPEX) costs for the production of high-purity lithium hydroxide from a plant situated in Clayton Valley, Nevada. These data will be core to Pure Energy’s plan to produce a Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) later this year.
Dr. Ron Molnar, Professional Metallurgical Engineer (Ontario P.E.# 100111288), is a qualified person as defined by NI 43-101, and has reviewed and approved the scientific and technical information that forms the basis for this news release. Dr. Molnar is independent of the Company.
About Pure Energy Minerals Ltd.
Pure Energy is a lithium-brine resource developer that is driven to become the lowest-cost lithium supplier for the burgeoning North American lithium battery industry. Pure Energy is currently focused on the development of our prospective CVS Lithium Brine Project, which has the following key attributes:
On behalf of the Board of Directors,
“Patrick Highsmith”
Chief Executive Officer
Forward Looking Statements: The information in this news release contains forward looking statements that are subject to a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in our forward looking statements. Factors that could cause such differences include: changes in world commodity markets, equity markets, costs and supply of materials relevant to the mining industry, change in government and changes to regulations affecting the mining industry. Forward-looking statements in this release may include statements regarding mineral processing, adaptation of test work to larger scale and/or future operational scales, estimates of reduced future capital and operating expenses, delivery of a preliminary economic assessment, future exploration programs, operation plans, geological interpretations, and mineral tenure issues. Although we believe the expectations reflected in our forward looking statements are reasonable, results may vary for reasons outside the control of the Company, and we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
CONTACT: CONTACT: Pure Energy Minerals Limited (www.pureenergyminerals.com) Email: info@pureenergyminerals.com Telephone – 604 608 6611, ext 5
The post Pure Energy Minerals Provides Update on Mini-Pilot Plant Work for Lithium Recovery Process appeared first on Investing News Network.
CALGARY, ALBERTA–(Marketwired – Aug. 10, 2016) – BACANORA MINERALS LTD. (“Bacanora” or the “Company“) (TSX VENTURE:BCN)(AIM:BCN), the AIM and TSX Venture Exchange listed lithium and borates company focussed on Mexico, announces that the Company will be postponing its upcoming annual and special meeting of its shareholders (the “Meeting“) on August 15, 2016 until September 28, 2016 (the “Postponement“). The Company decided on the Postponement in connection with the recent passing of Hon. Colin Orr-Ewing, a Non-Executive Director on August 3, 2016.
Hon. Colin Orr-Ewing was one of the director nominees and was one of the proxy appointees of the Company. The Company intends to seek an amended interim order from the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench regarding the new date of the Meeting and will be mailing out an addendum to the management information circular of the Company dated July 11, 2016 and an amended form of proxy to reduce the number of directors from seven to six, to remove Hon. Colin Orr-Ewing as a director nominee and to appoint an alternate proxy appointee.
ABOUT BACANORA:
Bacanora is a Canadian and London listed minerals explorer (TSX VENTURE:BCN)(AIM:BCN). The Company explores and develops industrial mineral projects, with a primary focus on lithium and borates. The Company’s operations are based in Hermosillo in northern Mexico and it currently has two significant projects under development in the state of Sonora. The two main assets of Bacanora are:
Reader Advisory
Except for statements of historical fact, this news release contains certain “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities law. Forward-looking information is frequently characterized by words such as “plan”, “expect”, “project”, “intend”, “believe”, “anticipate”, “estimate” and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions “may” or “will” occur. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking information are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. We cannot guarantee future results, performance or achievements. Consequently, there is no representation that the actual results achieved will be the same, in whole or in part, as those set out in the forward-looking information.
Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date the statements are made, and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking information. Some of the risks and other factors that could cause the results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking information include, but are not limited to: commodity price volatility; general economic conditions in Canada, the United States, Mexico and globally; industry conditions, governmental regulation, including environmental regulation; unanticipated operating events or performance; failure to obtain industry partner and other third party consents and approvals, if and when required; the availability of capital on acceptable terms; the need to obtain required approvals from regulatory authorities; stock market volatility; competition for, among other things, capital, skilled personnel and supplies; changes in tax laws; and the other risk factors disclosed under our profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Readers are cautioned that this list of risk factors should not be construed as exhaustive.
The forward-looking information contained in this news release is expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. We undertake no duty to update any of the forward-looking information to conform such information to actual results or to changes in our expectations except as otherwise required by applicable securities legislation. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information.
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
The post Bacanora Announces Postponement of Its August 15, 2016 Annual and Special Meeting appeared first on Investing News Network.
Thunder Bay, Ontario: Alset Energy Corp. (TSXV:ION) (“Alset” or “the Company”) is pleased to announce the appointment of Mr. Timothy S. Oliver, PE, P.Eng. as President and Chief Executive Officer of Alset Energy Corp. In addition, Mr. Oliver will be joining the Board of Directors. Mr. Stephen Stares will step down as the current President and CEO in order to focus his efforts as President and CEO of Benton Resources Inc. but will remain a director of the Company.
As previously announced (see Alset PR May 26, 2016), Mr. Oliver has extensive experience not only in Mexico but also in the lithium space having served as VP of Project Development for Lithium X Energy Corp. until February of this year.
Stephen Stares, co-founder and outgoing President and CEO stated “Tim initially joined our team to lead the Mexican Lithium Salar project development. His vast experience, perspective and ability to quickly assess and analyze the project was quite apparent and it was clear that Tim possessed the necessary skills to lead Alset moving forward. Tim’s extensive and multifaceted career in mining as well as his experience with lithium brines makes him an ideal CEO for Alset and we feel very fortunate that he has agreed to assume this role. We feel confident that Alset is in good hands and are excited for Tim to lead us to success in the future.”
Tim Oliver commented “I am thrilled to assume this leadership position at Alset. Given both my passion for the lithium space and my experience operating in Mexico, developing a completely new lithium brine district in the Central Mexican Plateau is an exciting prospect. The promise of potash production adds further potential shareholder value given the current lack of domestic supply in Mexico. In addition, the spodumene-rich Wisa Lake lithium project has significant potential and a targeted shallow diamond drill program should allow us to not only start delineating tonnage on the original showing but begin to present a third dimension to the other lithium-rich zones as well. Stephen and his team have done a tremendous job acquiring very attractive assets in Alset thus far and I look forward to strategically advancing these prospects towards development in the future”.
The post Alset Energy Appoints Tim Oliver as New President and CEO appeared first on Investing News Network.
Today, Sienna Resources Inc (TSXV:SIE) (A1XCQ0-FSE) (HBNRF-OTCBB) Clayton Valley Nevada lithium neighbour announced that “The Pure Energy and TBT team has achieved several intermediate milestones on the preliminary process engineering work for the Clayton Valley South (CVS) lithium brine project(full release below)”. Sienna has the property that is in the deepest sections of this basin that is the only basin in North America that is in production and Sienna has started work right beside Pure. Please refer to the map to see how Sienna is situated in the DEEPEST sections of this basin.
Management is very optimistic about Sienna as we have started operations. Sienna is in the deepest sections of the only basin in North America that is in production for Lithium. Sienna President Jason Gigliotti has recently purchased over 800,000 shares in the market between .21-.22 cents.
Pure Energy Minerals Ltd. is providing an update regarding its mini-pilot plant work with Tenova Bateman Technologies at its research and development centre in Katzrin, Israel, and at other off-site locations. The Pure Energy and TBT team has achieved several intermediate milestones on the preliminary process engineering work for the Clayton Valley South (CVS) lithium brine project:
The CVS mini-pilot plant program is beyond its halfway point, and progress has been excellent. This larger-scale study of Pure Energy’s proposed processing technology route for the CVS project is on track to highlight the advantages of a real-time new technology approach to lithium recovery. The team is advancing simultaneously on several areas of the program, as described in more detail below. All of these data will be integrated into the process design flow sheet and engineering studies that will comprise the company’s forthcoming preliminary economic assessment (PEA).
Patrick Highsmith, Pure Energy Minerals chief executive officer, commented: “We are very excited by our progress with Tenova Bateman Technologies on the mini-pilot plant. Last year’s preliminary test results showed the solvent extraction technology to be viable at bench scale, and this work is confirming success at a much larger scale while also providing engineering design data. As we reported in April of this year, the brine from our CVS project has among the lowest magnesium contents of any lithium brine resource in the world. This makes it well suited for new direct lithium extraction technology, such as the TBT process. We look forward to building on this interim technical success to highlight its potential for low-cost, highly sustainable and environmentally friendly lithium production technology.”
Connect with Sienna Resources Inc (TSXV:SIE) (A1XCQ0-FSE) (HBNRF-OTCBB) to receive an Investor Presentation.
The post Sienna Resources Announce Positive News Regarding the Lithium Recovery Process Targeted for Clayton Valley appeared first on Investing News Network.
Anfield Resources Inc. (TSXV:ARY,OTCQB:ANLDF) common shares have been accepted for trading on the OTCQB Venture Market in the United States, under the ticker ANLDF, effective immediately. Anfield Resources common shares will continue to trade on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol ARY.
Corey Dias, Anfield’s chief executive officer, stated: “We are pleased that Anfield’s common shares have commenced trading on the OTCQB marketplace. This gives the company access to a potentially larger capital pool in the U.S. through an additional convenient and transparent forum. The listing will also increase awareness of Anfield’s continued progress amongst prospective investors. Finally, given that Anfield’s assets are located in the U.S., we look forward to the prospect of gaining greater exposure and liquidity in this market.”
Connect with Anfield Resources Inc. (TSXV:ARY,OTCQB:ANLDF) to receive an Investor Presentation.
The post Anfield Resources Begins Trading on OTCQB appeared first on Investing News Network.
VANCOUVER, BC–(Marketwired – August 09, 2016) – Forum Uranium Corp. (TSXV:FDC) has commenced ground gravity and soil sampling surveys on its 100% owned Fir Island Project to define drill targets along the East Channel Structural Corridor. Five holes from the 2015 drill program encountered intense alteration (quartz dissolution, dravite, hydrothermal hematite and sudoite alteration minerals) within sandstones over a major structural lineament with a 50m vertical offset of the unconformity. The sandstone cover to the unconformity with basement rocks is shallow, varying from surface (0m) to a depth of 200 metres on the Fir Island property. The East Channel trend occurs for over 18 kilometres on Forum’s property and the 2015 winter drill program tested only 50 metres of this strike length.
The gravity and soil surveys will cover approximately 5 kilometres of the East Channel Trend on Fir Island and along the Black Bay Fault/East Channel intersection. Gravity measurements will be taken at stations 100 metres apart along lines spaced at 100 metre intervals to identify areas of low gravity (possible clay-rich alteration) favourable for uranium mineralization for future drilling. The soil survey will be conducted for analysis of uranium and other geochemical pathfinder elements such as boron, concentrating on areas down-ice of the gravity lows.
The parallel Black Lake structure, located 1.5 kilometres to the west, is part of the Snowbird Tectonic Zone that can be traced for at least 200 kilometres across the entire Athabasca Basin and is associated with Cameco’s Centennial deposit with intersections of up to 33.9 metres averaging 8.78% U3O8 (Source: Formation Metals website). This major structural zone exhibits similarities to the Wollaston-Mudjatik tectonic zone that hosts 16% of world uranium production, but remains relatively underexplored.
Figure 1: Map of the Fir Island Project. Claims are outlined in black. Both the Black Lake fault and the East Channel are wide structural zones. The Black Lake fault has numerous uranium showings along it, while the East Channel has only been tested with five holes to date. The proposed soil sampling program will be conducted along the west side of the gravity survey. Ice direction in this area is from east to west.
Connect with Forum Uranium Corp. (TSXV:FDC) to receive an Investor Presentation.
The post Forum Commences Gravity and Soil Surveys for Follow-Up Drilling at Fir Island, Athabasca Basin appeared first on Investing News Network.
Vancouver, British Columbia, August 9, 2016 – Eureka Resources (TSXV:EUK) is pleased to announce results of work programs completed on the Company’s FG property in June and July, 2016. The FG property is located in south-central British Columbia, 100 km east of Williams Lake.
An airborne geophysical survey was completed in 2007 covering a large portion of the Eureka Syncline. New claims were acquired in June, 2016 to cover the area of the airborne survey over the southern limb of the syncline (see announcement dated June, 27, 2016). A detailed geophysical interpretation was completed on these new claims by SJ Geophysics Ltd. of Surrey, B.C. in July, 2016. The results of this interpretation have revealed the three conductive/resistive horizons of the sedimentary package that makes up the favourable lithologies of gold mineralization in the Main Zone. These three horizons have been identified within the South Limb. The favourable horizon was found at a much higher elevation than anticipated which required acquiring 2 additional claims (30 cell units, 692 hectares) bringing the total claim package at FG to 30 claims (10,084 hectares).
In the Main Zone, the favourable horizon is interpreted at the contact of the upper resistive zone (Knotted phyllite) and the middle conductive zone (black banded phyllite). This same sequence appears at elevations ranging 1700 – 2000 meters (asl) at the South Limb. Only limited prospecting by geochemistry has been completed in this area of the property. It is intended to sample and prospect this target area in the fall, 2016.
Soil sampling completed in July, 2016 consisted of filling in areas of the northwest extension grid not sampled in 2015. It was completed by a two-man crew who collected 114 soil samples in what is referred to as the northwest “offset” zone. An additional crew completed mapping, sampling and prospecting the “offset” zone to note similar lithologies to the Main Zone. Results indicate a strong correlation of gold anomalies in soil to the favourable, electromagnetic horizon. Values ranged <5 ppb (detection limit) to 1100 ppb gold, the high value coinciding with the interpreted offset zone.
Coincidental soil and electromagnetic anomalies have provided significant drill targets along the northwest projection of the Main Zone. A diamond drill program designed to test the recently delineated targets in the northwest extension “offset” area would include a minimum of five diamond drill holes, each 200 – 300 meters in length, and totalling 1,250 meters.
“We are very pleased with the results of the geochemical program and geophysical interpretation,” stated Mike Sweatman, CEO of Eureka. “Results of drilling the northwest extension and “offset” zone may add significant ounces of gold to the established resource in the Main Zone,” he added.
Connect with Eureka Resources (TSXV:EUK) to receive an Investor Presentation.
The post Eureka Announces Results of 2016 Work Programs at FG appeared first on Investing News Network.
Critical Elements (TSXV:CRE,OTCQX:CRECF,FWB:F12) is an emerging specialty metals company focused on its Rose Lithium-Tantalum (“RL-T”) project near James Bay, in northern Quebec. Last year the Company signed a strategic Collaboration Agreement with a leading global chemical company that includes 100% take-or-pay off-take for all products produced, at market prices.
Critical Elements Corp.’s (“CEC”) PEA highlights a 99.98% purity, low-cost, hard rock lithium project with a pre-tax NPV(8%) & IRR of C$488 million & 33%, respectively (assuming a US$6k/Mt Lithium Carbonate (“LC”) price). The RL-T project benefits from a source of very low-iron spodumene concentrate, ideally suited for the glass & ceramic markets. Both technical & battery-grade lithium production is planned, with technical grade likely available in 2018 and battery-grade 12-18 months thereafter. If successful, this would allow CEC to generate cash flow to support development and commercialization of battery-grade lithium products. [See: Corp Presentation]
CEC began drilling the RL-T property in late 2009 and has been prudently advancing it towards full Feasibility ever since. Over the years, the Company has been meaningfully de-risked. So much so, that management believes it is within 6 months of nailing down project financing. As part of the above mentioned Collaboration Agreement, CEC’s strategic partner has the option to acquire a 25% interest in the equity capital of the project. A 100% take-or-pay off-take agreement with a large, creditworthy counter-party, should facilitate the Company’s efforts in obtaining debt financing.
Critical Elements Corp (“CEC”) on the Move
If the strategic partner invests at the project level for 25% of the equity, and debt financing is obtained for 60%-65%, that would leave the Company with 10%-15% to fund itself. In May, CEC raised gross proceeds of $6.2 million from a placement that CEO Jean Sébastien Lavallée explains went to a group of institutions, led by JP Morgan Management UK. Institutional ownership is key to the story moving forward, both as a vote of confidence in the Company’s progress and as an ongoing source of capital to fund the Company. In addition, CEC continues to pursue a modest non-dilutive cash injection.
This lithium player chart represents my perspective only, I produced the image myself. CEC, with a promising Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”), is in the 2nd tier, “Nearest to Production,” with 5 other prospective producers that are likely, or at least could, commence operations this decade. Among the members of this group, Critical Elements Corp. is perhaps least well known, for example the 5 peer developers have an average market cap nearly 4x the size of CECs.
Assuming that the Company obtains clear evidence of the availability of proper funding, it’s significant discount to peers could shrink. The Company is likely to attract a lot more attention as its business plan unfolds. In my view, CEC has the single best strategic off-take agreement in the developers space.
Its strategic partner has agreed to a take-or-pay arrangement for 100% of production, no matter what’s produced, while paying full market price. The partner is also contributing valuable technical assistance and market intelligence. This is a tremendous deal to sign with a Major global chemical company. A true vote of confidence in the project and management team.
June to date, an average daily trading volume of $1.5 million has traded, compared to $580k in May and $190k in April. Trading volume approaching $2 million/day meaningfully expands the universe of prospective investors.
CONCLUSION
With heavier trading volume, an expanded universe of investors and both positive technical & fundamental catalysts, I believe a new set of (larger) investors is probably accumulating positions. The average share price of late has been between roughly 60c-75c. It seems reasonable that, for the most part, sophisticated investors (not traders) paying 60c-75c/share, are not likely to be sellers below a $1/share. This is not a share price prediction or advice to buy shares, the lithium space is very speculative, so investment hurdle rates are high. Critical Elements Corp. (TSX-V: CRE) (US OTCQX: CRECF) (FSE: F12) offers an attractive opportunity to potentially ride the lithium wave higher, but with less risk of an epic wipeout.
Connect with Critical Elements (TSXV:CRE,OTCQX:CRECF,FWB:F12) to receive an Investor Presentation.
The post Epstein Research Report: Critical Elements Corp, Compelling Risk/Reward in Lithium appeared first on Investing News Network.
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA–(Marketwired – Aug. 8, 2016) –
THIS NEWS RELEASE IS NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO U.S. NEWSWIRE SERVICES FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES
Ultra Lithium Inc. (“Ultra Lithium” or the “Company“) (TSX VENTURE:ULI) is pleased to announce that Mr. Afzaal Pirzada has been appointed as the Company’s Vice President Exploration.
Afzaal Pirzada is a professional geoscientist with over 30 years’ experience in mineral exploration and mining with expertise in lithium and rare metals, graphite, PGE and uranium. Throughout his career, he has managed multiple exploration projects in various jurisdictions across Canada, USA and internationally. He has worked as Project Geologist, VP Exploration, Director and CEO of Adriana Resources, Rock Tech Lithium and various other mining companies. He has discovered one graphite deposit in Quebec, and successfully developed a lithium project in Ontario from early stage exploration to advanced exploration. He is registered as a professional geoscientist with the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia, Canada, authored several NI 43-101 technical and exploration work assessment reports, and has worked as a “Qualified Person” on mineral exploration projects. He is currently engaged in the exploration of Ultra Lithium’s brine lithium project at the South Big Smoky Valley in Nevada, USA, and hard rock lithium project at the Georgia Lake pegmatites in Northwestern Ontario, Canada.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,
Kiki Smith, CFO
About Ultra Lithium Inc.
Ultra Lithium is an exploration and development company with a focus on the acquisition and development of lithium assets. The Company is currently focused on North American acquisitions and exploring its Georgia Lake and South Big Smoky Valley Projects.
For further information, please visit www.ultralithium.com or view the Company’s filings at www.SEDAR.com.
The post Ultra Lithium Appoints Vice President Exploration appeared first on Investing News Network.
NexGen Energy (TSX:NXE) has reported assay results for seven holes from its recently completed winter 2016 drilling program on its 100 percent owned Rook I property in the Athabasca Basin.
As quoted in the press release:
Highlights:
A2 Sub-Zone
Scissor drilling collared from the southeast to the northwest at the Arrow Deposit has returned extensive high grade uranium mineralization in the higher grade A2 sub-zone (the “Sub-Zone”).
• Scissor hole AR-16-91c2 (38 m up-dip and northeast from AR-15-44b) intersected 40.5 m at 12.69% U3O8 (522.0 to 562.5 m) including 25.0 m at 19.97% U3O8 (526.0 to 551.0 m) and 1.5 m at 63.93% U3O8 (541.0 to 542.5 m).
Hole AR-16-91c2 has confirmed and increased the known width of the Sub-Zone and returned a continuous grade x thickness (“GT”) of 514. The Sub-Zone is now outlined by 23 holes, all of which intersected dense accumulations of massive-to-semi-massive pitchblende, sixteen of which were drilled after the release of the Company’s maiden NI 43-101 compliant Inferred Mineral Resource for the Rook I project on March 3, 2016.
A2 Shear High-Grade Domain
Infill drilling continues to verify that mineralization in the A2 shear is both extensive and continuous. These include 3 scissor holes drilled outside of the Sub-Zone but inside the A2 High-Grade Domain; highlights include:
• Scissor hole AR-16-84c4 (30 m down-dip and northeast from AR-15-44b) intersected 38.0 m at 1.92% U3O8 (566.0 to 604.0 m) including 11.0 m at 6.15% U3O8 (573.5 to 584.5 m).
• Scissor hole AR-16-91c3 (96 m up-dip and northeast from AR-15-44b) intersected 18.5 m at 3.26% U3O8 (485.0 to 503.5 m) including 7.5 m at 7.40% U3O8 (490.5 to 498.0 m).
Click here to read the full press release.
Discover why Bill Gates, Paul Allen and the founder of Greenpeace agree that Uranium is the #1 resource to invest in right now. Click here to access a special INN insider’s report on the uranium investing (value: $49) – For FREE.
The post NexGen Reports Assay Results from its Rook I Property appeared first on Investing News Network.
August 8, 2016 – Montreal, Quebec – Critical Elements (TSXV:CRE,OTCQX:CRECF,FWB:F12) is pleased to report the results of sampling on a pegmatite south of the Helico showing (Table 1). The samples were collected while the camp was being upgraded for future work as part of the planned feasibility study and drilling on the Rose tantalum-lithium project.
During the upgrade of the Rose lithium-tantalum project camp, a quick visit to two showings located south of the Helico showing (Helico Sud) and south of the Lac Eli-Ouest showing (Lac Eli-Sud) identified high-grade zones within the Helico Sud pegmatite. A total of nine chip samples were collected on the showings in areas of outcropping spodumene pegmatites. The results confirm high levels of lithium, up to 3.04% Li2O and 248 ppm Ta2O5, at Helico Sud.
Table 1. Results for Chip Samples from the Helico Sud and Lac Eli-Ouest-Sud1 Showings, July 2016
Year | Area | Sample No. | Easting | Northing | Li20 (%) | Ta2O5 ppm (g/t) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 | Lac Eli-Ouest | 669451 | 420577 | 5764168 | 0.01 | 89 |
2016 | Lac Eli-Ouest | 669452 | 420574 | 5764152 | 0.02 | 117 |
2016 | Lac Eli-Ouest | 669453 | 420572 | 5764140 | 0.01 | 93 |
2016 | Helico Sud | 669454 | 422545 | 5765693 | 0.22 | 72 |
2016 | Helico Sud | 669455 | 422563 | 5765684 | 2.45 | 92 |
2016 | Helico Sud | 669456 | 422759 | 5765748 | 1.46 | 118 |
2016 | Helico Sud | 669457 | 422809 | 5765715 | 3.04 | 173 |
2016 | Helico Sud | 669458 | 422870 | 5765700 | 2.14 | 150 |
2016 | Helico Sud | 669459 | 423211 | 5765656 | 0.33 | 248 |
1 Chip samples are selective by nature, and cannot be considered representative of the mineralization
Given these very promising results, Critical Elements has decided to prepare an exploration drilling program for September, including drilling on the Helico Sud sector, the JR showing and other spodumene pegmatites identified during previous work in the Pivert sector. The exploration drilling program will also include condemnation drilling to test for possible resources at the planned site of the various Rose lithium-tantalum project installations.
“These results are not only positive for the Corporation, they also once again demonstrate the quality and strong discovery potential on the Rose lithium-tantalum project for new near-surface lithium mineralized zones that could increase resources and extend the project mine life,” said Jean-Sébastien Lavallée, President and Chief Executive Officer of Critical Elements Corporation. “The coming months will be particularly exciting given the drilling planned on the various project showings and the feasibility study on the Rose lithium-tantalum project.”
Connect with Critical Elements (TSXV:CRE,OTCQX:CRECF,FWB:F12) to receive an Investor Presentation.
The post Critical Elements Samples up to 3.04% Lithium Oxide at Helico Sud appeared first on Investing News Network.
Gold prices were down 0.86 percent for the week after a sharp drop on Friday. As of 1:28 p.m. EST, gold was down 1.81 percent, trading at $1,338 per ounce.
Strong US employment data bolstered both equities and the US dollar, providing a headwind for the gold price. Nonfarm payroll employment was up by 255,000 in July, while unemployment rates held steady at 4.9 percent.
Silver prices also had a reaction to the news, dropping 3.28 percent on Friday to $19.74 per ounce as of 1:28 p.m. EST. For the week overall, silver was down 3.52 percent.
Click here to download an INN Insider’s Report on the copper market (value: $49) – For FREE. Limited time offer. No credit card required.
On the base metals side of things, copper prices fell for the week, losing 1.54 percent to trade at $2.16 per pound as of 1:26 p.m. EST. According to Reuters, the red metal was under pressure as funds sold ahead of the US jobs report. Copper on the LME was down 0.5 percent on Friday morning, trading at $4,809 per tonne.
“The market is waiting to see what the non-farm payrolls will bring, if it’s not a good number we could potentially be looking at no U.S. interest rate rises this year,” Caroline Bain, senior commodities economist at Capital Economics, told Reuters ahead of Friday’s job’s report. “That would in theory be good for commodities.”
Finally, spot oil prices were up 3.42 percent for the week despite a slight dip on Friday. That said, oil saw losses alongside other commodities on Friday in the wake of the US jobs report and a stronger dollar—prices dipped 0.98 percent to $41.48 per barrel as of 1:34 p.m. EST.
The US oil rig count was also up for the week, according to Baker Hughes, putting further pressure on oil.
“The dollar/oil correlation may be back today to pressure crude but the reality is we just have too much oil supply out there to continue supporting prices at these levels,” Phil Davis, trader at PSW Investments told Reuters. “We might hold above $40 next week but I doubt we will be trading at $42 when the new WTI front-month comes into play.”
Brent Crude futures were down 1.1 percent on Friday to $43.81 per barrel, while WTI futures dropped 1.3 percent to $41.38 per barrel, according to the news agency.
Don’t forget to follow us @INN_Resource for real-time news updates.
Click here to download an INN Insider’s Report on the copper market (value: $49) – For FREE. Limited time offer. No credit card required.
Securities Disclosure: I, Teresa Matich, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.
Related reading:
Weekly Round-Up: Gold Prices Still Rising
Weekly Round-Up: Gold Dips on Stronger Dollar
Weekly Round-Up: Gold Price Takes a Dip
Weekly Round-Up: Gold Price Hits 2-Year High
Weekly Round-Up: Gold Boom
Weekly Round-Up: Gold Price Briefly Tops $1,300
Weekly Round-Up: Gold Boom
Weekly Round-Up: Gold Price Leaps on US Jobs Data
The post Weekly Round-Up: Gold Drops 2 Percent on Strong US Jobs Data appeared first on Investing News Network.
DENVER, CO–(Marketwired – August 05, 2016) – Key Link Assets Corp. (OTCQB: KYLK), an independent oil and gas exploration company engaged in the acquisition and development of oil and natural gas properties in the Rockies and Mid-Continent, announced today that the Financial Industry Regulatory Association [FINRA] confirmed the below listed corporate actions requested by us:
“The new name — Foothills Exploration, Inc. — allows us to emphasize that we are engaged in the acquisition and development of producing oil and gas properties,” said B.P. Allaire, Interim Chief Executive Officer of Foothills Exploration, Inc. “We are committed to continue with our acquisition of distressed and undervalued oil and gas assets that, in our opinion, will create shareholder value.”
About Foothills Exploration, Inc.
Foothills Exploration, Inc., (“FTXP”) through its wholly owned subsidiary Foothills Petroleum, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Foothills”), is an early stage, independent oil and gas exploration and development company engaged in acquiring and developing oil and natural gas properties in the Rockies and Mid-Continent. Foothills seeks to acquire dislocated and underdeveloped oil and gas assets and maximize those assets to create shareholder value. Foothills maintains its principal executive office in Denver, Colorado.
Forward Looking Statements
This release contains forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ from those projected due to a number of risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to the possibility that some or all of the matters and transactions considered by FTXP may not proceed as contemplated, and by all other matters specified in FTXP’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These statements are made based upon current expectations that are subject to substantial risk and uncertainty. FTXP does not undertake to update forward-looking statements in this news release to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting such forward-looking information. Assumptions and other information that could cause results to differ from those set forth in the forward-looking information can be found in the FTXP’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its most recent periodic reports.
Investor and Media Contact
Foothills Exploration, Inc.
B.P. Allaire
Interim Chief Executive Officer
Email contact
(720) 449-7478
Click here to download an I.N.N. Insider’s Report on the oil market (value: $49) – For FREE. Limited time offer. No credit card required.
The post Key Link Assets Corp. Announces Name Change to Foothills Exploration, Inc. appeared first on Investing News Network.
CALGARY, ALBERTA–(Marketwired – Aug. 4, 2016) – BACANORA MINERALS LTD. (“Bacanora” or the “Company”) (TSX VENTURE:BCN)(AIM:BCN) the AIM and TSX Venture Exchange listed lithium and borates company focussed on Mexico, announces the sad passing of the Hon. Colin Orr-Ewing, a Non-Executive Director and, until recently, Chairman of the Company, on 3 August 2016 following a short illness. The Directors and employees of Bacanora would like to take this opportunity to extend their sincerest condolences to Colin’s family.
For over 40 years Colin has been a larger than life personality within London’s mining and energy scene. Colin’s long and successful career included executive management positions with KCA and Kimberly Oil in the USA, investment manager for the Shell Pension Fund and subsequently a long association with Blakeney Capital Management. Colin, in his capacity as an investor, adviser and seed financier made a significant contribution to the development of many resource projects all over the globe. More recently, Colin’s focus turned to the borates industry and his persistence and intuition were the driving force behind the discovery of the Sonora lithium deposit and the creation of Bacanora Minerals. Colin’s passion for Bacanora will be long remembered, particularly as his Company continues to develop the Sonora Lithium Project over the forthcoming years.
James Leahy, Non-executive Chairman of Bacanora, said “We are all deeply saddened by the news of Colin’s sudden death and all the sympathies and thoughts of the Board and employees are with his family at this time. At both the Company and personal level we will forever be in his debt. Colin was the founder of Bacanora and under his leadership as Chairman it has flourished, becoming the Company it is today thanks to his vision, energy, enthusiasm and hard work. On behalf of my colleagues, we have all lost a great friend who was always generous with his time, wise counsel and support. It is a huge understatement to say he will be deeply missed by us all.”
ABOUT BACANORA:
Bacanora is a Canadian and London listed minerals explorer (TSX VENTURE:BCN)(AIM:BCN). The Company explores and develops industrial mineral projects, with a primary focus on lithium and borates. The Company’s operations are based in Hermosillo in northern Mexico and it currently has two significant projects under development in the state of Sonora. The two main assets of Bacanora are:
Reader Advisory
Except for statements of historical fact, this news release contains certain “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities law. Forward-looking information is frequently characterized by words such as “plan”, “expect”, “project”, “intend”, “believe”, “anticipate”, “estimate” and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions “may” or “will” occur. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking information are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. We cannot guarantee future results, performance or achievements. Consequently, there is no representation that the actual results achieved will be the same, in whole or in part, as those set out in the forward-looking information.
Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date the statements are made, and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking information. Some of the risks and other factors that could cause the results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking information include, but are not limited to: commodity price volatility; general economic conditions in Canada, the United States, Mexico and globally; industry conditions, governmental regulation, including environmental regulation; unanticipated operating events or performance; failure to obtain industry partner and other third party consents and approvals, if and when required; the availability of capital on acceptable terms; the need to obtain required approvals from regulatory authorities; stock market volatility; competition for, among other things, capital, skilled personnel and supplies; changes in tax laws; and the other risk factors disclosed under our profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Readers are cautioned that this list of risk factors should not be construed as exhaustive.
The forward-looking information contained in this news release is expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. We undertake no duty to update any of the forward-looking information to conform such information to actual results or to changes in our expectations except as otherwise required by applicable securities legislation. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information.
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
The post Bacanora Announces Director/Founder Passing appeared first on Investing News Network.
CALGARY, ALBERTA–(Marketwired – Aug. 5, 2016) – (TSX:POU) –
HIGHLIGHTS
MUSREAU/KAKWA SALE TRANSACTION
The Sale Transaction is a transformational event for Paramount and is consistent with Paramount’s long historical track record of early stage resource capture and delineation followed by strategic and creative value realization. Following the close of the Sale Transaction, Paramount will have the financial resources to continue with this strategy on its remaining Montney, Duvernay and other resource properties. In addition, Paramount intends to be an active participant in the market for acquisitions as the Company will have extensive financial flexibility and access to capital markets, providing a significant competitive advantage.
The consideration payable to Paramount by 7G for the Musreau/Kakwa Assets will be approximately $1.9 billion (subject to customary closing adjustments) which will be comprised of a combination of: $475 million in cash, 33.5 million 7G class A common shares (having a value of approximately C$837 million based on the 10 day VWAP of the 7G shares on July 5, 2016, the day immediately prior to announcement of the Sale Transaction), the assumption by 7G of Paramount’s US$450 million 6.875% senior unsecured notes due 2023 and certain oil and gas properties in the Musreau/Kakwa area having a value of approximately $6 million. The cash consideration received will be used to reduce Paramount’s debt and for general corporate purposes.
The Musreau/Kakwa Assets had sales volumes of approximately 30,000 Boe/d for the three month period ended June 30, 2016 and 34,000 Boe/d for the six month period ended June 30, 2016. The Musreau/Kakwa Assets also include minor facilities and gathering systems related to the oil and gas properties being sold. 7G will also assume Paramount’s processing and transportation commitments relating to the Musreau/Kakwa Assets in connection with the Sale Transaction.
The Sale Transaction has an effective date of June 1, 2016 and an expected closing date of August 18, 2016. Completion of the Sale Transaction is subject to the approval of Paramount’s shareholders, regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions.
Additional information concerning the Sale Transaction can be found in Paramount’s Material Change Report dated July 12, 2016 and Information Circular dated July 15, 2016, both of which are available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
2019 Notes Consent Solicitation
In connection with the Sale Transaction, Paramount has commenced a consent solicitation and given notice of conditional redemption in respect of its $450 million principal amount of 7.625% senior unsecured notes due 2019 (the “2019 Notes”).
The consent solicitation seeks consent from the holders of the 2019 Notes (the “2019 Noteholders”) to waive and amend certain provisions of the indenture for the 2019 Notes such that the Sale Transaction can be completed with consenting holders remaining as holders of their 2019 Notes post-closing. A consent fee of $5.00 per $1,000 principal amount of 2019 Notes is payable to those 2019 Noteholders who provide their consent, conditional on the Sale Transaction closing. The consent solicitation is conditional on, among other things, closing of the Sale Transaction and a minimum acceptance from 2019 Noteholders holding at least $100 million principal amount of 2019 Notes, with a maximum acceptance of $300 million principal amount (with Paramount able to waive such maximum). The Sale Transaction will be completed regardless of the results of the consent solicitation, as the 2019 Notes of all non-consenting 2019 Noteholders will be redeemed.
2019 Noteholders who wish to consent must instruct their intermediary (broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee) who is a CDS participant to complete and execute the consent form and mail, email or deliver the form to Computershare Trust Company of Canada, the depositary, in accordance with the procedures set forth in the consent form. Consents should not be delivered to Paramount. 2019 Noteholders who do not deliver a properly completed and executed consent on or prior to 5:00 pm (Toronto time) on August 15, 2016 will have their 2019 Notes redeemed.
The consent solicitation and notice of conditional redemption and related documents are available on Paramount’s website at:
http://www.paramountres.com/investor-relations/the-musreaukakwa-disposition-documents
Scotia Capital Inc. has been retained by Paramount as sole lead solicitation agent in connection with the consent solicitation.
PARAMOUNT – POST SALE TRANSACTION
Following the Sale Transaction, Paramount will continue to have a land base (excluding emerging plays and strategic investments in the northern frontier and oil sands) of over 660,000 net acres of land, including 380,000 net acres of Montney rights. The Company plans to continue the development of its liquids-rich Deep Basin plays, comprised of:
Paramount will also continue to hold a significant portfolio of emerging plays and strategic investments, including:
The market value of Paramount’s investments in other public and private oil and gas companies (including Seven Generations shares) following completion of the Sale Transaction is estimated to be approximately $1.2 billion, approximately $11.00 per Paramount share, based on current market prices.
Paramount’s 2016 capital spending following the closing of the Sale Transaction will be focused on expanding the Company’s existing 4,500 Boe/d Karr-Gold Creek development. The Karr-Gold Creek area encompasses approximately 110 net sections of land directly north of the divested Musreau/Kakwa Assets where condensate yields and well economics are similar to that of the Kakwa/Musreau Montney.
The following tables set out the sales volumes and netback of Paramount for the six months ended June 30, 2016, excluding the Musreau/Kakwa Assets:
Six months ended June 30 | ||||||
2016 | 2015 | |||||
Natural gas (MMcf/d) | 49.7 | 49.4 | ||||
Condensate and oil (Bbl/d) | 2,712 | 2,318 | ||||
Other NGLs (1) (Bbl/d) | 805 | 1,211 | ||||
Total (Boe/d) | 11,802 | 11,764 | ||||
% Liquids | 30 | % | 30 | % |
(1) | Other NGLs means ethane, propane and butane. |
Six Months ended June 30 | |||||||||
2016 | 2015 | ||||||||
($MM) | ($/Boe)(1) | ($MM) | ($/Boe)(1) | ||||||
Natural gas revenue | 17.2 | 1.90 | 25.8 | 2.88 | |||||
Condensate and oil revenue | 22.2 | 44.90 | 23.2 | 55.40 | |||||
Other NGLs revenue (2) | 0.9 | 6.04 | 3.6 | 16.27 | |||||
Royalty and sulphur revenue | 0.6 | – | 1.5 | – | |||||
Petroleum and natural gas sales | 40.9 | 19.02 | 54.1 | 25.42 | |||||
Royalties | (0.6 | ) | (0.29 | ) | (1.9 | ) | (0.89 | ) | |
Operating expense | (26.5 | ) | (12.34 | ) | (25.5 | ) | (11.96 | ) | |
Transportation and NGLs processing (3) | (10.0 | ) | (4.64 | ) | (6.5 | ) | (3.06 | ) | |
Netback | 3.8 | 1.75 | 20.2 | 9.51 |
(1) | Natural gas revenue shown per Mcf. |
(2) | Other NGLs means ethane, propane and butane. |
(3) | Includes downstream natural gas, NGLs and oil transportation costs and NGLs fractionation costs incurred by the Company. |
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (1) ($ millions, except as noted) | |||||||||||||
Three months ended June 30 | Six months ended June 30 | ||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | % Change | 2016 | 2015 | % Change | ||||||||
Sales volumes | |||||||||||||
Kaybob (Boe/d) | 32,584 | 35,473 | (8 | ) | 36,558 | 32,924 | 11 | ||||||
Grande Prairie (Boe/d) | 5,833 | 5,645 | 3 | 6,603 | 6,142 | 8 | |||||||
Other (Boe/d) | 2,473 | 1,486 | 66 | 2,365 | 1,406 | 68 | |||||||
Total (Boe/d) | 40,890 | 42,604 | (4 | ) | 45,526 | 40,472 | 12 | ||||||
Natural gas (MMcf/d) | 129.8 | 154.4 | (16 | ) | 141.9 | 151.5 | (6 | ) | |||||
Condensate and oil (Bbl/d) | 9,490 | 7,595 | 25 | 11,368 | 7,092 | 60 | |||||||
Other NGLs (Bbl/d) (2) | 9,764 | 9,282 | 5 | 10,512 | 8,131 | 29 | |||||||
Total (Boe/d) | 40,890 | 42,604 | (4 | ) | 45,526 | 40,472 | 12 | ||||||
% Liquids | 47 | % | 40 | % | 48 | % | 38 | % | |||||
Petroleum and natural gas sales | 73.6 | 94.6 | (22 | ) | 164.8 | 174.8 | (6 | ) | |||||
Average realized price ($/Boe) | 19.79 | 24.40 | (19 | ) | 19.89 | 23.86 | (17 | ) | |||||
Netback including commodity contract settlements | 28.4 | 54.3 | (48 | ) | 88.6 | 99.4 | (11 | ) | |||||
$/Boe | 7.64 | 14.00 | 10.70 | 13.56 | |||||||||
Funds flow from operations | (4.9 | ) | 19.6 | (125 | ) | 17.5 | 35.3 | (50 | ) | ||||
per share – diluted ($/share) | (0.05 | ) | 0.19 | 0.16 | 0.34 | ||||||||
Exploration and Capital Expenditures | |||||||||||||
Principal Properties Capital (3) | 26.2 | 88.1 | (70 | ) | 46.3 | 276.3 | (83 | ) | |||||
Strategic Investments | 4.2 | 12.8 | (67 | ) | 19.8 | 42.7 | (54 | ) | |||||
Other | 11.1 | 0.6 | nm | 11.4 | 6.1 | 87 | |||||||
Total | 41.5 | 101.5 | (59 | ) | 77.5 | 325.1 | (76 | ) | |||||
Net loss | (30.6 | ) | (60.2 | ) | (49 | ) | (76.5 | ) | (130.5 | ) | (41 | ) | |
per share – diluted ($/share) | (0.29 | ) | (0.57 | ) | (0.72 | ) | (1.24 | ) | |||||
Total assets | 2,158.1 | 3,522.4 | (39 | ) | |||||||||
Net Debt | 1,363.9 | 1,746.2 | (22 | ) | |||||||||
Common shares outstanding (thousands) | 106,241 | 106,212 | – | ||||||||||
Investments in other entities – market value (4) | 162.1 | 227.3 | (29 | ) |
nm | Not meaningful |
(1) | Readers are referred to the advisories concerning Non-GAAP Measures and Oil and Gas Measures and Definitions in the Advisories section of this document. |
(2) | Other NGLs means ethane, propane and butane. |
(3) | Principal Properties Capital includes capital expenditures and geological and geophysical costs related to the Company’s Principal Properties, and excludes land acquisitions and capitalized interest. |
(4) | Based on the period-end closing prices of publicly-traded investments and the book value of the remaining investments. |
Paramount is an independent, publicly traded, Canadian corporation that explores for and develops conventional petroleum and natural gas prospects, pursues longer-term non-conventional exploration and pre-development projects and holds investments in other entities. The Company’s properties are primarily located in Alberta and British Columbia. Paramount’s Class A Common Shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “POU”.
Paramount’s second quarter 2016 results, including Management’s Discussion and Analysis and the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, can be obtained at: http://media3.marketwire.com/docs/1064890a.pdf.
This information will also be made available through Paramount’s website at www.paramountres.com and SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
ADVISORIES
Forward Looking Information
Certain statements in this document constitute forward-looking information under applicable securities legislation. Forward-looking information typically contains statements with words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “will”, “expect”, “plan”, “schedule”, “intend”, “propose”, or similar words suggesting future outcomes or an outlook. Forward-looking information in this document includes, but is not limited to:
Such forward-looking information is based on a number of assumptions which may prove to be incorrect. Assumptions have been made with respect to the following matters, in addition to any other assumptions identified in this document:
Although Paramount believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking information are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on them as Paramount can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Forward-looking information is based on expectations, estimates and projections that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by Paramount and described in the forward-looking information. The material risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:
The foregoing list of risks is not exhaustive. For more information relating to risks, see the section titled “RISK FACTORS” in Paramount’s current annual information form. The forward-looking information contained in this document is made as of the date hereof and, except as required by applicable securities law, Paramount undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Non-GAAP Measures
In this document “Funds flow from operations”, “Netback”, “Net Debt”, “Exploration and Capital Expenditures”, “Principal Properties Capital” and “Investments in other entities – market value”, collectively the “Non-GAAP measures”, are used and do not have any standardized meanings as prescribed by International Financial Reporting Standards.
Funds flow from operations refers to cash from operating activities before net changes in operating non-cash working capital, geological and geophysical expenses and asset retirement obligation settlements. Funds flow from operations is commonly used in the oil and gas industry to assist management and investors in measuring the Company’s ability to fund capital programs and meet financial obligations. Netback equals petroleum and natural gas sales less royalties, operating costs and transportation and NGLs processing costs. Netback is commonly used by management and investors to compare the results of the Company’s oil and gas operations between periods. Net Debt is a measure of the Company’s overall debt position after adjusting for certain working capital amounts and is used by management to assess the Company’s overall leverage position. Refer to the liquidity and capital resources section of the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the period for the calculation of Net Debt. Exploration and capital expenditures consist of the Company’s spending on wells and infrastructure projects, other property, plant and equipment, land and property acquisitions, capitalized interest and geological and geophysical costs incurred. The closest GAAP measure to exploration and development expenditures is property, plant and equipment and exploration cash flows under investing activities in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, which includes all of the items included in exploration and capital expenditures, except for geological and geophysical costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 of $1.0 million and $2.2 million, respectively (2015 – $1.1 million and $2.6 million, respectively), which are expensed as incurred. Principal Properties Capital includes capital expenditures and geological and geophysical costs related to the Company’s Principal Properties, and excludes land acquisitions and capitalized interest. The Principal Properties Capital measure provides management and investors with information regarding the Company’s Principal Properties spending on drilling and infrastructure projects separate from land acquisition activity and capitalized interest. Refer to the Exploration and Capital Expenditures section of the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the period. Investments in other entities – market value reflects the Company’s investments in enterprises whose securities trade on a public stock exchange at their period end closing price (e.g. Trilogy Energy Corp., MEG Energy Corp., Marquee Energy Ltd., RMP Energy Inc., Strategic Oil & Gas Ltd. and others), and investments in all other entities at book value. Paramount provides this information because the market values of equity-accounted investments, which are significant assets of the Company, are often materially different than their carrying values.
Non-GAAP measures should not be considered in isolation or construed as alternatives to their most directly comparable measure calculated in accordance with GAAP, or other measures of financial performance calculated in accordance with GAAP. The Non-GAAP measures are unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers.
Oil and Gas Measures and Definitions
This document contains disclosures expressed as “Boe”, “$/Boe” and “Boe/d”. Natural gas equivalency volumes have been derived using the ratio of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil. Equivalency measures may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A conversion ratio of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the well head. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the value ratio between crude oil and natural gas was approximately 30:1. This value ratio is significantly different from the energy equivalency ratio of 6:1. Using a 6:1 ratio would be misleading as an indication of value. The term “Liquids” is used to represent oil, condensate and Other NGLs. NGLs consist of condensate and Other NGLs. The term “Other NGLs” means ethane, propane and butane.
The post Paramount Announces Second Quarter 2016 Results appeared first on Investing News Network.
TORONTO, ONTARIO–(Marketwired – Aug. 4, 2016) – Denison Mines Corp. (“Denison” or the “Company”) (TSX:DML)(NYSE MKT:DNN) today filed its Consolidated Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion & Analysis (“MD&A”) for the period ended June 30, 2016. Both documents can be found on the Company’s website at www.denisonmines.com or on SEDAR (at www.sedar.com) and EDGAR (at www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml). The highlights provided below are derived from these documents and should be read in conjunction with them. All amounts in this release are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated.
David Cates, President and CEO of Denison commented “Our team in Saskatchewan is busy in the field as part of our summer exploration and project evaluation programs. Already, results from the summer exploration program have reinforced the potential for both resource expansion and development at the Wheeler River project. We’ve extended the recently discovered D series lenses, discovered new basement-hosted mineralization 500 metres west of the Gryphon deposit, and confirmed high grade results previously reported for the Gryphon deposit with initial infill drilling.
The Company has also been very active outside of the exploration portfolio, launching an initial pre-feasibility study work program at Wheeler River, completing a flow-through equity financing, closing a transaction with GoviEx Uranium to combine uranium assets in Africa, and entering into an option agreement with Skyharbour Resources Ltd. to fund additional exploration on the Moore Lake property. While the uranium market may appear muted today, we continue to believe in the strong long term fundamentals of the nuclear energy industry, and we’re focused on advancing our assets and positioning our brand to be ready to take advantage of a rising market in future years.”
2016 SECOND QUARTER PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS
ABOUT DENISON
Denison is a uranium development and exploration company focused in the infrastructure rich eastern portion of the Athabasca Basin region in northern Saskatchewan, Canada. Highlighted by its 60% owned Wheeler River development project, which hosts the high grade Gryphon and Phoenix uranium deposits, Denison’s project portfolio covers over 350,000 hectares and includes a 22.5% interest in the McClean Lake uranium mill, which is permitted for annual production of up to 24 million pounds U3O8 and is currently processing ore from the Cigar Lake mine under a toll milling agreement. Denison’s interests in the eastern Athabasca Basin also include a 61.55% interest in the J Zone deposit on the Waterbury Lake property, a 25.17% interest in the Midwest deposit, and a 22.5% interest in the McClean lake uranium deposits – all of which are located within 20 kilometres of the McClean Lake mill.
Denison is also engaged in mine decommissioning and environmental services through its Denison Environmental Services division and is the manager of Uranium Participation Corp., a publicly traded company which invests in uranium oxide and uranium hexafluoride.
EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION
The Company’s continued focus remains on the eastern portion of the Athabasca Basin region in Saskatchewan, Canada, with a significant portfolio of projects covering over 350,000 hectares in total. Denison’s share of exploration and evaluation expenditures were $2,126,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2016.
Wheeler River Project
The Wheeler River property is host to the high-grade Phoenix and Gryphon uranium deposits, discovered by Denison in 2008 and 2014 respectively. The Phoenix deposit is estimated to include an indicated resource of 70.2 million pounds U3O8 (above a cut-off grade of 0.8% U3O8) based on 166,000 tonnes of mineralization at an average grade of 19.1% U3O8, and is the highest grade undeveloped uranium deposit in the world. The Gryphon deposit is hosted in basement rock, approximately 3 kilometres to the northwest of Phoenix, and is estimated to contain inferred resources of 43.0 million pounds U3O8 (above a cut-off grade of 0.2% U3O8) based on 834,000 tonnes of mineralization at an average grade of 2.3% U3O8.
Further details regarding the Wheeler River Project are provided in the current Technical Report, dated March 31, 2016, a copy of which is available on SEDAR and EDGAR.
Exploration Programs
Denison’s share of exploration costs at Wheeler River amounted to $897,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2016. The summer exploration program began on May 30, 2016, and is expected to continue into September 2016.
During the winter 2016 drill program a new mineralized zone was discovered within 200 metres north and northwest of the Gryphon deposit. The new zone of mineralization is interpreted to occur as another set of stacked, parallel lenses which are broadly conformable with the Gryphon deposit A, B and C lenses. The lenses, designated the D series lenses, have not been included in the Mineral Resource Estimate Report dated November 25, 2015, or the PEA dated March 31, 2016, and form a compelling mineralized zone for resource expansion, with assay highlights announced on May 26, 2016 including 5.3% U3O8 over 11.0 metres, 11.9% U3O8 over 1.5 metres, 2.9% U3O8 over 6.0 metres, 2.3% U3O8 over 4.0 metres and 6.2% U3O8 over 2.5 metres.
To date, the D Series mineralization is interpreted to occur as 16 individual lenses which occur deeper into the stratigraphic sequence, or footwall, to the Gryphon deposit. The collective D series lenses currently measure (including initial summer 2016 results) approximately 215 metres long in the plunge direction, 130 metres wide across the plunge and range in thickness from 2 to 11 metres. By comparison the Gryphon deposit A, B and C lenses collectively measure 450 metres long in the plunge direction, 80 metres wide across the plunge and range in thickness from 2 to 9 metres.
Three priority ‘D Series’ target areas were identified for drill testing this summer as follows:
The highlights for the summer 2016 drill program, to the end of June 2016, are provided in the table below.
Highlights of mineralized intersections from summer 2016 on Section 5100 GP, 5250 GP and 5300 GP |
|||||
Section | Drill Hole | From (m) | To (m) | Length (m)(3) |
eU3O8 (%) (1)(2) |
5100GP | WR-665 | 683.1 | 685.6 | 2.5 | 0.11 |
and | 692.3 | 693.7 | 1.4 | 0.15 | |
and | 717.3 | 722.7 | 5.4 | 0.10 | |
5250GP | WR-657 | 550.9 | 551.9 | 1.0 | 0.10 |
and | 629.3 | 630.3 | 1.0 | 0.18 | |
and | 698.0 | 700.1 | 2.1 | 0.39 | |
and | 711.7 | 712.9 | 1.2 | 0.68 | |
WR-661 | 554.0 | 555.0 | 1.0 | 0.27 | |
and | 694.4 | 695.5 | 1.1 | 1.5 | |
5300 GP | WR-667A | 572.2 | 573.3 | 1.1 | 0.28 |
and | 688.8 | 689.8 | 1.0 | 0.42 | |
Drill hole WR-663, which is located 500 metres to the west of the Gryphon deposit, was designed to test basement potential on the largely unexplored K-West conductive trend. The drill hole intersected basement-hosted mineralization including 0.039% eU3O8 over 1.1 metres, 0.04% eU3O8 over 2.0 metres and 0.021% eU3O8 over 5.2 metres (using a 0.01% eU3O8 cut-off and 0.5 metre minimum thickness). Although no high-grade mineralization was intersected, the intensity and extent of the alteration zone, with an estimated true thickness of approximately 50 metres, indicate significant fluid flow with potential for higher grades along strike, and up- and down-dip. The zone is mostly open within the basement and, given the close proximity to Gryphon and similar favorable geological setting, follow up is warranted.
As the drill hole was oriented steeply toward the northwest and the basement mineralization is interpreted to dip moderately to the southeast, the true thickness of the mineralization is expected to be approximately 75% of the intersection lengths. The results are reported as radiometric equivalent U3O8 (“eU3O8“) derived from a calibrated total gamma down-hole probe using a cut-off of 0.1% eU3O8, a minimum mineralization thickness of 1.0 metre and maximum waste of 2.0 metres. All mineralized intersections will be sampled for chemical U3O8 assay.
A plan map of the northeast plunging Gryphon deposit mineralized lenses is provided in Figure 1. The map indicates the location of the D series lenses interpreted from winter 2016 drilling results, the summer 2016 mineralized intercepts shown as red stars and the K-West mineralized intercepts shown as green stars. The simplified basement geology at the sub-Athabasca unconformity is provided as the backdrop.
An infill drilling program commenced on the Gryphon deposit in early July 2016. The objective of the infill drilling program is to increase the level of confidence of the previously released inferred resources estimated for the Gryphon deposit to an indicated level – an important step in completing the PFS. The resource estimate for the Gryphon deposit includes the A, B and C series lenses – a set of parallel, stacked, elongated mineralized lenses that are broadly conformable with the basement geology and dip moderately to the southeast and plunge moderately to the northeast.
Results from the first infill drill hole WR-668, as announced on July 19, 2016, intersected 0.93% eU3O8 over 14.1 metres (including 2.1% eU3O8 over 3.7 metres and 1.4% eU3O8 over 1.3 metres) from 754.7 to 768.8 metres, and 2.4% eU3O8 over 7.3 metres (including 3.7% eU3O8 over 4.5 metres) from 772.6 to 779.9 metres, which reinforces the high grade results previously reported for the Gryphon deposit. The results can be correlated with previous intersections of the A, B and C lenses in neighbouring holes and the high grades were consistent with previous results, demonstrating good lens and grade continuity. As the drill hole was oriented steeply toward the northwest, consistent with previous Gryphon drill holes, and the basement mineralization is interpreted to dip moderately to the southeast, the true thickness of the mineralization is expected to be approximately 75% of the intersection lengths. The results are reported as radiometric equivalent U3O8 (“eU3O8“) derived from a calibrated total gamma down-hole probe using a cut-off of 0.1% eU3O8, a minimum mineralization thickness of 1.0 metre and maximum waste of 2.0 metres. All mineralized intersections will be sampled for chemical U3O8 assay.
Evaluation Program
During the three months ended June 30, 2016, Denison’s share of evaluation costs at Wheeler River amounted to $39,000, and were mainly related to the internal evaluation, field investigations and engineering studies completed for the Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”) released early in the second quarter, and the initiation of PFS activities.
The results of the PEA were announced by the Company on April 4, 2016 and included a base case pre-tax Internal Rate of Return (“IRR”) of 20.4%, an indicative post-tax IRR to Denison of 17.8%, and a pre-tax Net Present Value (“NPV”) of CAD$513 million (Denison’s share – CAD$308 million), based on a long term contract price for uranium of $44 per pound U3O8. The PEA also included a production scenario based on a uranium price of $62.60 per pound U3O8, resulting in a pre-tax IRR of 34.1% and a pre-tax NPV of CAD$1,420 million (Denison’s share – CAD$852 million).
The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. Additional definition drilling is required to improve the confidence in the existing mineral resources estimated for the Gryphon deposit, and is expected to be completed as the Company advances the project towards the completion of a PFS. The PEA is posted on the Company’s website and is available on SEDAR and EDGAR.
In the second quarter of 2016, Denison initiated a work program to support the completion of a PFS for the Wheeler River project and to ultimately advance the project a further step towards production. Initial PFS activities to date included:
Exploration Pipeline Properties
During the second quarter of 2016, the Company managed or participated in three other exploration drilling programs (two of which were operated by Denison). Highlights include the following:
At Waterbury Lake (Denison 61.55% interest and operator), six holes drilled in the second quarter successfully intersected graphitic pelites, faulting and associated alteration in the Oban target area. Potential exists along strike and follow-up drilling in this area is expected to be planned once the geochemical assay results have been received.
At Turkey Lake (Denison 100% interest), three holes were drilled to test a soil uranium anomaly and coincident electromagnetic conductors. As expected, no Athabasca sandstone was encountered and basement lithologies comprised predominantly granites or pelitic gneisses. The highly anomalous soil uranium results were attributed to pegmatites with highly elevated radioactivity. An additional hole intersected favourable graphitic faults in the basement, but lacked alteration and radioactivity. Follow-up along strike may be warranted.
At Mann Lake (Denison 30% interest), a three hole program was completed. One hole intersected weak uranium mineralization. The other two holes intersected significant structure and alteration in the lower sandstone associated with an unconformity offset related to the GC fault.
SELECTED ANNUAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(in thousands) | As at June 30, 2016 |
As at December 31, 2015 |
||
Financial Position of Continuing Operations: | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 17,835 | $ | 5,367 |
Debt Instruments (GICs) | – | 7,282 | ||
Cash, cash equivalents debt instruments | $ | 17,835 | $ | 12,649 |
Working capital | $ | 14,201 | $ | 12,772 |
Property, plant and equipment | $ | 194,554 | $ | 188,250 |
Total assets | $ | 229,044 | $ | 212,758 |
Total long-term liabilities | $ | 39,581 | $ | 38,125 |
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||
(in thousands, except for per share amounts) | June 30, 2016 |
June 30, 2015 |
June 30, 2016 |
June 30, 2015 |
||||
Results of Continuing Operations: | ||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 3,663 | $ | 2,929 | $ | 6,993 | $ | 5,257 |
Net loss | $ | (3,832) | $ | (3,982) | $ | (8,277) | $ | (7,835) |
Basic and diluted loss per share | $ | (0.01) | $ | (0.01) | $ | (0.02) | $ | (0.02) |
RESULTS OF CONTINUING OPERATIONS
Revenues
During the first half of 2016, the McClean Lake mill packaged approximately 8.6 million pounds U3O8 for the CLJV and the Company’s share of toll milling revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2016 totaled $1,147,000.
Revenue from Denison Environmental Services (“DES”) and the Company’s management services agreement with UPC during the three months ended June 30, 2016, were $2,144,000 and $372,000, respectively.
Operating expenses
Operating expenses in the Canadian mining segment include depreciation, mining and other development costs, as well as standby costs. Operating expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2016 were $800,000 including $583,000 of depreciation from the McClean Lake mill, associated with the processing of U3O8 for the CLJV.
Operating expenses in DES during the three months ended June 30, 2016 totaled $1,830,000. The expenses relate primarily to care and maintenance and consulting services provided to clients and include labour costs.
General and administrative expenses
Total general and administrative expenses were $1,227,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2016. These costs are mainly comprised of head office salaries and benefits, office costs, audit and regulatory costs, legal fees, investor relations expenses, project costs and other costs related to operating a public company with listings in Canada and the United States.
Impairment of mineral properties
During the second quarter of 2016, the Company recognized an impairment of $2,174,000 against the value of its Moore Lake property.
RESULTS OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Loss on sale of African-Based Uranium Interests
During the second quarter of 2016, the Company recognized a loss on disposal of the Africa mining division of $70,000, which includes $637,000 of cumulative foreign currency losses recognized as translational foreign exchange losses in the period of disposal. The total consideration received on the disposal amounted to $4,978,000 at fair value and includes the fair value of the GoviEx shares received of $3,954,000, the fair value of GoviEx warrants received of $1,162,000 and offset by transaction costs of $138,000.
Sale of Mongolian Mining division
On July 22, 2016, the Mineral Resources Authority of Mongolia (“MRAM”) issued mining licenses to the Gurvan Saihan Joint Venture (“GSJV”) for the Hairhan, Haraat, Gurvan Saihan and Ulzit projects. The GSJV was acquired by Uranium Industry as part of the November 30, 2015 sale of the Mongolia Mining Division. Under the licensing process, the GSJV has ten working days from the license issuance date to remit the required first year mining license fees to the Mongolian Government in order to receive the mining certificates required as proof of holding mining licenses in Mongolia. In accordance with the sale agreement with Uranium Industry, certain contingent payments are due to Denison within 60 days of the issuance of a mining license.
No expenditures were incurred in the Mongolian Mining division in the quarter.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and cash equivalents were $17,835,000 at June 30, 2016. The Company holds the large majority of its cash, cash equivalents and investments in Canadian Dollars. As at June 30, 2016, the Company’s cash, cash equivalents and current investments amount to CAD$23.0 million. The Company’s CAD$24 million credit facility is fully utilized for non-financial letters of credit in relation to future decommissioning and reclamation plans. The facility contains a covenant that requires the Company to maintain a minimum cash balance of CAD$5 million on deposit with the Bank of Nova Scotia.
OUTLOOK FOR 2016
The Company’s Outlook for 2016 remains largely unchanged, except for the expected revenues from the sale of uranium inventory, exploration and evaluation expenditures planned in Canada, and the plans for Africa, each of which has been modified for the remainder of the year and incorporated into the Company’s current Outlook.
(in thousands) | 2016 BUDGET |
2016 OUTLOOK |
Actual to June 30, 2016 |
|||
Canada (1) | ||||||
Toll Milling Revenue & Mineral Sales | $ | 5,440 | $ | 4,540 | $ | 2,330 |
Development & Operations | (2,400) | (2,400) | (720) | |||
Mineral Property Exploration & Evaluation | (13,000) | (12,000) | (7,150) | |||
(9,960) | (9,860) | (5,540) | ||||
Africa | ||||||
Zambia, Mali and Namibia | (1,290) | (520) | (520) | |||
(1,290) | (520) | (520) | ||||
Other (1) | ||||||
UPC Management Services | 1,530 | 1,530 | 670 | |||
DES Environmental Services | 920 | 920 | 570 | |||
Corporate Administration & Other | (4,250) | (4,250) | (2,340) | |||
(1,800) | (1,800) | (1,100) | ||||
Total | $ | (13,050) | $ | (12,180) | $ | (7,160) |
The sale of approximately 25,000 pounds U3O8, currently held by Denison in inventory, has been deferred until market conditions improve.
The 2016 outlook for Canadian exploration program, inclusive of the evaluation work planned for Wheeler River, has been updated to reflect a reduction in winter exploration activities actually completed during the first half of the year.
In June 2016, Denison announced the completion of the Africa Transaction to sell its African assets to GoviEx. The current outlook reflects the activities completed during the first half of the year. No additional expense are expected in relation to the African assets during the remainder of the year.
Qualified Person
The disclosure regarding the PEA was reviewed and approved by Peter Longo, P. Eng, MBA, PMP, Denison’s Vice-President, Project Development, who is a Qualified Person in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101. The balance of the disclosure of scientific and technical information regarding Denison’s properties in this press release and the MD&A was prepared by or reviewed and approved by Dale Verran, MSc, Pr.Sci.Nat., the Company’s Vice President, Exploration, a Qualified Person in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101. For a description of the data verification, assay procedures and the quality assurance program and quality control measures applied by Denison, please see Denison’s Annual Information Form dated March 24, 2016 available under Denison’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com, and its Form 40-F available on EDGAR at www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain information contained in this press release constitutes “forward-looking information”, within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and similar Canadian legislation concerning the business, operations and financial performance and condition of Denison.
Generally, these forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, or “believes”, or the negatives and/or variations of such words and phrases, or state that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur”, “be achieved” or “has the potential to”. In particular, this press release contains forward-looking information pertaining to the following: the likelihood of completing and benefits to be derived from corporate transactions; the results of the PEA and expectations regarding further studies, including the PFS; expectations regarding the toll milling of Cigar Lake ores; expectations regarding revenues and expenditure from operations at DES; capital expenditure programs, estimated exploration and development expenditures and reclamation costs and Denison’s share of same; expectations of market prices and costs; supply and demand for uranium; and exploration, development and expansion plans and objectives and statements regarding anticipated budgets. Statements relating to “mineral reserves” or “mineral resources” are deemed to be forward-looking information, as they involve the implied assessment, based on certain estimates and assumptions that the mineral reserves and mineral resources described can be profitably produced in the future.
Forward looking statements are based on the opinions and estimates of management as of the date such statements are made, and they are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of Denison to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Denison believes that the expectations reflected in this forward-looking information are reasonable but no assurance can be given that these expectations will prove to be accurate and may differ materially from those anticipated in this forward looking information. For a discussion in respect of risks and other factors that could influence forward-looking events, please refer to the factors discussed in Denison’s Annual Information Form dated March 24, 2016 under the heading “Risk Factors”. These factors are not, and should not be construed as being exhaustive. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
The forward-looking information contained in this press release is expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. Any forward-looking information and the assumptions made with respect thereto speaks only as of the date of this press release. Denison does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking information after the date of this press release to conform such information to actual results or to changes in Denison’s expectations except as otherwise required by applicable legislation.
Cautionary Note to United States Investors Concerning Estimates of Measured, Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources: This press release may use the terms “measured”, “indicated” and “inferred” mineral resources. United States investors are advised that while such terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize them. “Inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or other economic studies. United States investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of measured or indicated mineral resources will ever be converted into mineral reserves. United States investors are also cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.
FIGURE 1- Wheeler River Property Map and Basement Geology: http://media3.marketwire.com/docs/1064948.pdf
Follow Denison on Twitter
@DenisonMinesCo
Discover why Bill Gates, Paul Allen and the founder of Greenpeace agree that Uranium is the #1 resource to invest in right now. Click here to access a special INN insider’s report on the uranium investing (value: $49) – For FREE.
The post Denison Reports Results From Encouraging Q2 2016, Including Further Exploration Success and Initiation of Pre-Feasibility Study at Wheeler River appeared first on Investing News Network.
HOUSTON, Aug. 03, 2016 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —
Marathon Oil Corporation (NYSE:MRO) today reported a second quarter 2016 net loss of $170 million, or $0.20 per diluted share. The net loss includes the impact of certain items not typically represented in analysts’ earnings estimates and that would otherwise affect comparability of results. The adjusted net loss for the quarter was $196 million or $0.23 per diluted share.
Highlights
“Within six weeks of announcing our acquisition of high-quality assets in the STACK oil window, we’ve already closed the transaction and will accelerate an additional rig on this acreage in the third quarter while still decreasing our 2016 capital budget. This deal expands our inventory and further positions Marathon Oil for growth in Oklahoma at a competitive valuation. Coupled with recent non-core divestitures, we’re delivering on our objective to further concentrate our capital allocation to the lower cost, higher margin U.S. resource plays,” said Marathon Oil President and CEO Lee Tillman. “In addition to successful portfolio management, we continued our relentless focus on reducing costs and driving durable operational efficiencies while delivering impressive new well results in the resource plays.”
North America E&P
North America Exploration and Production (E&P) production available for sale averaged 224,000 net barrels of oil equivalent per day (boed) for second quarter 2016. On a divestiture-adjusted basis, production was down 6 percent from the prior quarter and 13 percent from the year-ago period. Second quarter North America production costs were 5 percent lower than the previous quarter and 28 percent lower than the year-ago period. On a per barrel basis, unit production costs were $6.28 per barrel of oil equivalent (boe), down 13 percent from the year-ago period and essentially flat with the prior period.
OKLAHOMA RESOURCE BASINS: The Company’s unconventional Oklahoma production averaged 27,000 net boed during second quarter 2016, flat to the prior quarter and up compared to 24,000 net boed in the year-ago quarter. During second quarter 2016, Marathon Oil brought online two gross Company-operated STACK Meramec extended lateral (XL) wells in the volatile oil window. The Irven John achieved a 30-day production rate of 1,710 boed (70 percent oil) and the Olive June averaged 1,570 boed (75 percent oil) over 30 days. Additionally, three SCOOP Woodford XL wells were brought online, with the Eubank well averaging 1,950 boed (30 percent oil) over 30 days.
The Company closed on the STACK acquisition on Aug. 1. Since announcing the acquisition, three additional Meramec wells — Moeller, Blackjack and Post — have reached 30 days of production with rates of 1,925 boed (51 percent oil), 1,365 boed (47 percent oil) and 780 boed (51 percent oil), respectively, and at an average completed well cost of approximately $4 million. Marathon Oil continues to operate the drilling rig on the acquired STACK acreage and will add one incremental rig late in the third quarter. This will bring consolidated drilling activity to four rigs in Oklahoma primarily focused in the STACK. The Company expects eight to 10 STACK Meramec wells to sales in the third quarter.
EAGLE FORD: In second quarter 2016, Marathon Oil’s production in the Eagle Ford averaged 109,000 net boed, compared to 120,000 net boed in the prior quarter and 135,000 net boed in the year-ago quarter. The sequential production decrease was due to lower completion activity with 40 percent fewer gross operated wells brought to sales and reduced contribution from 2015 high-density pads drilled at tighter well spacing. During second quarter 2016, the Company brought 30 gross (21 net) operated wells to sales, of which 19 were lower Eagle Ford, three upper Eagle Ford and eight Austin Chalk, compared to 50 gross (32 net) wells to sales in the previous quarter. The Hollman six-well pad, an Austin Chalk and lower Eagle Ford co-development, was brought online with 30-day production rates averaging 1,055 to 2,020 boed (45-53 percent oil). Second quarter completed well costs were $4.2 million, down approximately 30 percent from the year-ago quarter. Wells were drilled at an average rate of 2,400 feet per day and an average spud-to-total depth of less than eight days.
BAKKEN: Marathon Oil averaged 53,000 net boed of production in the Bakken during second quarter 2016, compared to 57,000 net boed in the prior quarter and 61,000 net boed in the year-ago quarter as strong well productivity and high reliability continued supporting the base production. Four gross wells were brought to sales in the second quarter — two Middle Bakken and two Three Forks — all with higher intensity completions of 12 to 18 million pounds of proppant per well and about 45 stages per well. The Clarks Creek Middle Bakken well achieved a 30-day initial production rate of 2,840 boed (84 percent oil) making it the highest rate well in the Williston basin in the past three years. Additionally, the Juanita Middle Bakken well and the Charmaine well in the first bench of the Three Forks achieved 2,700 boed (84 percent oil) and 2,530 boed (84 percent oil), respectively, over 30 days. Despite the higher intensity completions, completed well costs averaged $6 million per well.
GULF OF MEXICO: The outside-operated Gunflint oil development on Mississippi Canyon block 948 in the Gulf of Mexico achieved first production in July. The two-well field is ramping up and is expected to reach a minimum gross production of 20,000 boed with oil representing approximately 75 percent of the volumes produced. Marathon Oil holds an 18 percent working interest.
During third quarter 2016, Marathon Oil signed an agreement to terminate its Gulf of Mexico deepwater drilling rig contract. As a result, the Company expects to recognize a termination payment of $113 million in other operating expense in the quarter, which will be reported as a special item.
International E&P
International E&P production available for sale (excluding Libya) averaged 120,000 net boed for second quarter 2016, an increase of 20 percent compared to the prior quarter and up 11 percent compared to the year-ago quarter. The increase over the prior quarter was primarily a result of a full quarter of production in Equatorial Guinea, the resumption of production from Brae Alpha in the U.K., increased production efficiency at other Brae facilities and better reliability from Foinaven. Second quarter production costs (excluding Libya) were 17 percent lower than the year-ago quarter. On a per barrel basis, unit production costs (excluding Libya) were $4.34 per boe, a decrease of 25 percent compared to the year-ago quarter.
EQUATORIAL GUINEA: Production available for sale averaged 102,000 net boed in second quarter 2016 compared to 84,000 net boed in the previous quarter and 86,000 net boed in the year-ago quarter. Second quarter 2016 base production continued to benefit from last year’s re-completion and development programs as well as the absence of downtime experienced in the previous and year-ago quarters. The Alba B3 compression project, designed to maintain the production plateau two additional years and extend field life up to eight years, was completed within budget and on schedule with first gas in early July. The B3 platform allows Marathon Oil to convert approximately 130 million boe of proved undeveloped reserves, more than doubling the Company’s remaining proved developed reserve base in EG.
U.K.: Production available for sale averaged 18,000 net boed in second quarter 2016, compared to 16,000 net boed in the previous quarter and 22,000 net boed in the year-ago quarter. Second quarter 2016 benefited from resumption of normal operations at the Brae Alpha platform and better reliability from the outside-operated Foinaven field.
Oil Sands Mining
Oil Sands Mining (OSM) production available for sale for second quarter 2016 averaged 40,000 net barrels per day (bbld) compared to 49,000 net bbld in the prior quarter and 25,000 net bbld in the year-ago quarter. The decrease compared to first quarter 2016 was due in part to a 4,000 bbld impact from the temporary suspension of operations at the mines related to wildfire response efforts in May. In addition, planned maintenance activities at the expansion upgrader and the Jackpine mine were completed on schedule and on budget. Despite the referenced production impacts, second quarter production was within guidance as mining operations achieved record production levels in June. Operating expense per synthetic barrel (before royalties) was $39.00, an increase compared to the previous quarter due primarily to second quarter planned maintenance, currency effects and the impacts of downtime related to the wildfires.
Guidance
Marathon Oil expects third quarter 2016 North America E&P production available for sale to average 200,000 to 210,000 net boed which reflects the divestment of the majority of the Wyoming assets, the inclusion of the STACK assets in Oklahoma acquired Aug. 1, and decline from the Eagle Ford high-density pads drilled in 2015. Third quarter International E&P production available for sale (excluding Libya) is expected to be within a range of 125,000 to 135,000 net boed. Considerable uncertainty remains around the timing of future production and sales levels from Libya, and Marathon Oil continues to exclude Libya volumes from its production forecasts. OSM synthetic crude oil production is expected to range from 45,000 to 50,000 net bbld.
The Company is adjusting its full-year 2016 E&P production guidance range resulting in a new range of 330,000 to 345,000 net boed, which reflects divestitures and acquisitions closed to date. OSM synthetic crude oil production guidance remains unchanged at 40,000 to 50,000 net bbld.
Full-year guidance for North America unit production costs is being adjusted down by $1.00 per boe to a range of $6.00 to $7.00 per boe. Full-year guidance for International unit production costs is being adjusted down by $0.50 per boe to a range of $4.50 to $5.50 per boe.
Additionally, the Company expects its full-year 2016 capital program to be $1.3 billion, or $100 million lower than the original budget, despite the inclusion of increased activity from the Oklahoma STACK acquisition.
Corporate and Special Items
Net cash provided by operating activities was $178 million during second quarter 2016, and net cash provided by operations before changes in working capital was $290 million. Cash additions to property, plant and equipment were $299 million in second quarter 2016. Total liquidity as of June 30 was $5.9 billion, which consists of $2.6 billion in cash and cash equivalents and an undrawn revolving credit facility of $3.3 billion.
During the quarter, the Company announced the sale of Wyoming assets for proceeds of $870 million, before closing adjustments, of which approximately $690 million was received in the second quarter with the remaining assets expected to close before year end. The Company entered into separate agreements to sell its 10 percent working interest in the outside-operated Shenandoah in the Gulf of Mexico, assets in Colorado and certain undeveloped acreage in West Texas for a combined total of approximately $80 million in proceeds, before closing adjustments. During the quarter, it closed on certain of these asset sales and expects the remaining sales to close by year-end.
The adjustments to net loss for second quarter 2016 total $41 million before tax and largely consist of: a net gain on the sale of assets of $296 million; impairments associated with the decision to not drill remaining Gulf of Mexico undeveloped leases of $141 million; a pension settlement of $31 million; and an unrealized loss on commodity derivatives of $91 million.
The Company’s webcast commentary and associated slides related to Marathon Oil’s financial and operational review, as well as the Quarterly Investor Packet, will be posted to the Company’s website at http://ir.marathonoil.com and to its mobile app as soon as practicable following this release today, Aug. 3. The Company will conduct a question and answer webcast/call on Thursday, Aug. 4, at 9:00 a.m. ET. The associated commentary and answers to questions will include forward-looking information. To listen to the live webcast, visit the Marathon Oil website at http://www.marathonoil.com. The audio replay of the webcast will be posted by Aug. 5.
# # #
Non-GAAP Measures
Management uses certain non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted net income (loss) and net cash provided by operations before changes in working capital, to evaluate the Company’s financial performance between periods and to compare the Company’s performance to certain competitors. Management also uses net cash provided by operations before changes in working capital to demonstrate the Company’s ability to internally fund capital expenditures, pay dividends and service debt. These measures should not be considered substitutes for their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. See the tables below for reconciliations between each non-GAAP financial measure and its most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
Forward-looking Statements
This release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, including without limitation statements regarding the Company’s future performance, business strategy, reserve estimates, asset quality, production guidance, drilling plans, capital plans, cost and expense estimates, asset acquisitions and sales, future financial position, and other plans and objectives for future operations, are forward-looking statements. Words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “guidance,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would,” or similar words may be used to identify forward-looking statements; however, the absence of these words does not mean that the statements are not forward-looking. While the Company believes its assumptions concerning future events are reasonable, a number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected, including, but not limited to: conditions in the oil and gas industry, including supply/demand levels and the resulting impact on price; changes in expected reserve or production levels; changes in economic conditions in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates, inflation rates, and global and domestic market conditions; risks related to the Company’s hedging activities; the Company’s level of success in integrating acquisitions; capital available for exploration and development; drilling and operating risks; well production timing; availability of materials and labor; difficulty in obtaining necessary approvals and permits; non-performance by third parties of contractual obligations; unforeseen hazards such as weather conditions; political conditions and developments, including political instability, acts of war or terrorism, and the governmental or military response thereto; cyber-attacks; changes in safety, health, environmental, tax and other regulations; other geological, operating and economic considerations; and the risk factors, forward-looking statements and challenges and uncertainties described in the Company’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and other public filings and press releases, available at www.marathonoil.com. The Company undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) | Three Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30 | Mar. 31 | June 30 | |||||||
(In millions, except per share data) | 2016 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||
Revenues and other income: | |||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues, including related party | $ | 870 | $ | 714 | $ | 1,307 | |||
Marketing revenues | 89 | 58 | 183 | ||||||
Income from equity method investments | 37 | 14 | 26 | ||||||
Net gain (loss) on disposal of assets | 294 | (60 | ) | — | |||||
Other income | 12 | 4 | 15 | ||||||
Total revenues and other income | 1,302 | 730 | 1,531 | ||||||
Costs and expenses: | |||||||||
Production | 350 | 328 | 450 | ||||||
Marketing, including purchases from related parties | 88 | 58 | 182 | ||||||
Other operating | 95 | 109 | 81 | ||||||
Exploration | 189 | 24 | 111 | ||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 561 | 609 | 751 | ||||||
Impairments | — | 1 | 44 | ||||||
Taxes other than income | 39 | 48 | 78 | ||||||
General and administrative | 132 | 151 | 168 | ||||||
Total costs and expenses | 1,454 | 1,328 | 1,865 | ||||||
Income (loss) from operations | (152 | ) | (598 | ) | (334 | ) | |||
Net interest and other | (86 | ) | (85 | ) | (58 | ) | |||
Income (loss) before income taxes | (238 | ) | (683 | ) | (392 | ) | |||
Benefit for income taxes | (68 | ) | (276 | ) | (6 | ) | |||
Net income (loss) | $ | (170 | ) | $ | (407 | ) | $ | (386 | ) |
Adjustments for special items (pre-tax): | |||||||||
Net (gain) loss on dispositions | (296 | ) | 63 | — | |||||
Proved property impairments | — | — | 44 | ||||||
Unproved property impairments | 141 | — | — | ||||||
Pension settlement | 31 | 48 | 64 | ||||||
Unrealized (gain) loss on commodity derivative instruments | 91 | 23 | 44 | ||||||
Reduction in workforce | 1 | 7 | (2 | ) | |||||
Other | (9 | ) | — | — | |||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes related to special items | 15 | (51 | ) | (54 | ) | ||||
Alberta provincial corporate tax rate increase | — | — | 135 | ||||||
Adjusted net income (loss) (a) | $ | (196 | ) | $ | (317 | ) | $ | (155 | ) |
Per diluted share: | |||||||||
Net Income (loss) | $ | (0.20 | ) | $ | (0.56 | ) | $ | (0.57 | ) |
Adjusted net income (loss) (a) | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.43 | ) | $ | (0.23 | ) |
Weighted average diluted shares | 848 | 730 | 677 |
(a) Non-GAAP financial measure. See “Non-GAAP Measures” above for further discussion.
Supplemental Statistics (Unaudited) | Three Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30 | Mar. 31 | June 30 | |||||||
(in millions) | 2016 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||
Segment income (loss) | |||||||||
North America E&P | $ | (70 | ) | $ | (195 | ) | $ | (45 | ) |
International E&P | 55 | 4 | 41 | ||||||
Oil Sands Mining | (38 | ) | (48 | ) | (77 | ) | |||
Segment income (loss) | (53 | ) | (239 | ) | (81 | ) | |||
Not allocated to segments | (117 | ) | (168 | ) | (305 | ) | |||
Net income (loss) | $ | (170 | ) | $ | (407 | ) | $ | (386 | ) |
Exploration expenses | |||||||||
North America E&P | $ | 37 | $ | 18 | $ | 91 | |||
International E&P | 4 | 6 | 20 | ||||||
Oil Sands Mining | 7 | — | — | ||||||
Segment exploration expenses | 48 | 24 | 111 | ||||||
Not allocated to segments | 141 | — | — | ||||||
Total | $ | 189 | $ | 24 | $ | 111 | |||
Cash flows | |||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 178 | $ | 74 | $ | 408 | |||
Minus: changes in working capital | (112 | ) | 19 | (112 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operations before changes in working capital (a) | $ | 290 | $ | 55 | $ | 520 | |||
Cash additions to property, plant and equipment | $ | (299 | ) | $ | (454 | ) | $ | (868 | ) |
(a) Non-GAAP financial measure. See “Non-GAAP Measures” above for further discussion.
Three Months Ended | Guidance(a) | |||||||
June 30 | Mar. 31 | June 30 | Q3 | Full Year | ||||
(mboed) | 2016 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2016 | |||
Net production available for sale | ||||||||
North America E&P (b) | 224 | 239 | 274 | 200-210 | ||||
International E&P excluding Libya (c) | 120 | 100 | 108 | 125-135 | ||||
Combined North America & International E&P, excluding Libya (c) | 344 | 339 | 382 | 325-345 | 330-345 | |||
Oil Sands Mining (d) | 40 | 49 | 25 | 45-50 | 40-50 | |||
Total Company excluding Libya | 384 | 388 | 407 | |||||
Libya | — | — | — | |||||
Total Company | 384 | 388 | 407 |
(a) Guidance includes the effect of acquisitions and divestitures closed to date.
(b)The sale of the Company’s East Texas, North Louisiana and Wilburton, Oklahoma natural gas assets closed in August 2015, and the sale of its Gulf of Mexico assets closed in December 2015 and February 2016.
(c) Libya is excluded because of uncertainty around timing of future production and sales levels.
(d) Upgraded bitumen excluding blendstocks.
Three Months Ended | ||||||
June 30 | Mar. 31 | June 30 | ||||
(mboed) | 2016 | 2016 | 2015 | |||
Net production available for sale | ||||||
North America E&P | 224 | 239 | 274 | |||
Less: Divestitures (a) | (13 | ) | (15 | ) | (31 | ) |
Divestiture-adjusted North America E&P | 211 | 224 | 243 |
(a) Divestitures include the sale of Wyoming assets closed in June 2016; East Texas, North Louisiana and Wilburton, Oklahoma assets closed in August 2015; and the sale of Gulf of Mexico assets closed in December 2015 and February 2016. These production volumes have been removed from all periods shown in arriving at divestiture-adjusted North America E&P net production available for sale.
Supplemental Statistics (Unaudited) | Three Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30 | Mar. 31 | June 30 | |||||||
2016 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||
North America E&P – net sales volumes | |||||||||
Liquid hydrocarbons (mbbld) | 173 | 186 | 213 | ||||||
Bakken | 49 | 53 | 57 | ||||||
Eagle Ford | 84 | 95 | 108 | ||||||
Oklahoma resource basins | 14 | 12 | 11 | ||||||
Other North America (a) | 26 | 26 | 37 | ||||||
Crude oil and condensate (mbbld) | 135 | 147 | 176 | ||||||
Bakken | 44 | 47 | 54 | ||||||
Eagle Ford | 61 | 70 | 82 | ||||||
Oklahoma resource basins | 6 | 5 | 5 | ||||||
Other North America (a) | 24 | 25 | 35 | ||||||
Natural gas liquids (mbbld) | 38 | 39 | 37 | ||||||
Bakken | 5 | 6 | 3 | ||||||
Eagle Ford | 23 | 25 | 26 | ||||||
Oklahoma resource basins | 8 | 7 | 6 | ||||||
Other North America (a) | 2 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
Natural gas (mmcfd) | 310 | 315 | 361 | ||||||
Bakken | 24 | 25 | 22 | ||||||
Eagle Ford | 150 | 154 | 164 | ||||||
Oklahoma resource basins | 82 | 89 | 81 | ||||||
Other North America (a) | 54 | 47 | 94 | ||||||
Total North America E&P (mboed) | 224 | 239 | 274 | ||||||
International E&P – net sales volumes | |||||||||
Liquid hydrocarbons (mbbld) | 44 | 32 | 42 | ||||||
Equatorial Guinea | 30 | 25 | 28 | ||||||
United Kingdom | 14 | 7 | 14 | ||||||
Crude oil and condensate (mbbld) | 33 | 23 | 33 | ||||||
Equatorial Guinea | 19 | 16 | 19 | ||||||
United Kingdom | 14 | 7 | 14 | ||||||
Natural gas liquids (mbbld) | 11 | 9 | 9 | ||||||
Equatorial Guinea | 11 | 9 | 9 | ||||||
Natural gas (mmcfd) | 457 | 382 | 396 | ||||||
Equatorial Guinea | 430 | 351 | 365 | ||||||
United Kingdom (b) | 27 | 31 | 31 | ||||||
Total International E&P (mboed) | 120 | 96 | 108 | ||||||
Oil Sands Mining – net sales volumes | |||||||||
Synthetic crude oil (mbbld) (c) | 49 | 59 | 29 | ||||||
Total Company – net sales volumes (mboed) | 393 | 394 | 411 | ||||||
Net sales volumes of equity method investees | |||||||||
LNG (mtd) | 5,797 | 4,322 | 4,991 | ||||||
Methanol (mtd) | 1,303 | 1,280 | 673 | ||||||
Condensate and LPG (boed) | 11,306 | 10,208 | 8,586 |
(a) Includes Gulf of Mexico and other conventional onshore U.S. production. The sale of the Company’s Gulf of Mexico assets closed in December 2015 and February 2016.
(b) Includes natural gas acquired for injection and subsequent resale of 5 mmcfd, 5 mmcfd, and 7 mmcfd in the second and first quarter of 2016, and second quarter of 2015, respectively.
(c) Includes blendstocks.
Supplemental Statistics (Unaudited) | Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
June 30 | Mar. 31 | June 30 | |||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||
North America E&P – average price realizations (a) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Liquid hydrocarbons ($ per bbl) | $ | 35.07 | $ | 24.00 | $ | 45.96 | |||||||||||||||
Bakken | 38.38 | 26.00 | 49.29 | ||||||||||||||||||
Eagle Ford | 34.31 | 23.02 | 44.05 | ||||||||||||||||||
Oklahoma resource basins | 25.57 | 19.41 | 30.29 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other North America (b) | 36.27 | 25.51 | 50.89 | ||||||||||||||||||
Crude oil and condensate ($ per bbl) (c) | $ | 40.77 | $ | 28.21 | $ | 52.63 | |||||||||||||||
Bakken | 42.00 | 28.78 | 51.36 | ||||||||||||||||||
Eagle Ford | 41.21 | 28.65 | 53.47 | ||||||||||||||||||
Oklahoma resource basins | 41.55 | 29.74 | 51.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other North America (b) | 37.27 | 25.66 | 52.83 | ||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas liquids ($ per bbl) | $ | 14.84 | $ | 8.12 | $ | 14.77 | |||||||||||||||
Bakken | 7.73 | 3.47 | 11.63 | ||||||||||||||||||
Eagle Ford | 15.68 | 7.05 | 14.08 | ||||||||||||||||||
Oklahoma resource basins | 14.88 | 11.86 | 14.45 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other North America (b) | 23.64 | 23.47 | 25.65 | ||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas ($ per mcf) | $ | 1.96 | $ | 2.02 | $ | 2.76 | |||||||||||||||
Bakken | 1.77 | 2.09 | 2.62 | ||||||||||||||||||
Eagle Ford | 2.02 | 1.98 | 2.71 | ||||||||||||||||||
Oklahoma resource basins | 1.92 | 2.03 | 2.64 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other North America (b) | 1.95 | 2.10 | 2.98 | ||||||||||||||||||
International E&P – average price realizations | |||||||||||||||||||||
Liquid hydrocarbons ($ per bbl) | $ | 32.11 | $ | 22.66 | $ | 44.70 | |||||||||||||||
Equatorial Guinea | 27.28 | 20.43 | 35.74 | ||||||||||||||||||
United Kingdom | 42.32 | 30.20 | 61.93 | ||||||||||||||||||
Crude oil and condensate ($ per bbl) | $ | 42.21 | $ | 30.95 | $ | 56.70 | |||||||||||||||
Equatorial Guinea | 41.46 | 30.93 | 52.27 | ||||||||||||||||||
United Kingdom | 43.25 | 30.72 | 62.97 | ||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas liquids ($ per bbl) | $ | 2.65 | $ | 2.20 | $ | 3.10 | |||||||||||||||
Equatorial Guinea (d) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
United Kingdom | 25.99 | 23.56 | 36.49 | ||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas ($ per mcf) | $ | 0.53 | $ | 0.60 | $ | 0.78 | |||||||||||||||
Equatorial Guinea (d) | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.24 | ||||||||||||||||||
United Kingdom | 5.06 | 4.61 | 6.98 | ||||||||||||||||||
Oil Sands Mining – average price realizations | |||||||||||||||||||||
Synthetic crude oil ($ per bbl) | $ | 40.88 | $ | 26.41 | $ | 52.46 | |||||||||||||||
Benchmark | |||||||||||||||||||||
WTI crude oil (per bbl) | $ | 45.64 | $ | 33.63 | $ | 57.95 | |||||||||||||||
Brent (Europe) crude oil (per bbl)(e) | $ | 45.52 | $ | 33.70 | $ | 61.69 | |||||||||||||||
Henry Hub natural gas (per mmbtu)(f) | $ | 1.95 | $ | 2.09 | $ | 2.64 | |||||||||||||||
WCS crude oil (per bbl)(g) | $ | 32.29 | $ | 19.21 | $ | 46.35 |
(a) Excludes gains or losses on derivative instruments.
(b) Includes Gulf of Mexico and other conventional onshore U.S. production. The sale of the Company’s Gulf of Mexico assets closed in December 2015 and February 2016.
(c) Inclusion of realized gains on crude oil derivative instruments would have increased average price realizations by $0.12, $1.64, and $0.06 for second and first quarters of 2016 and second quarter of 2015.
(d) Represents fixed prices under long-term contracts with Alba Plant LLC, Atlantic Methanol Production Company LLC and/or Equatorial Guinea LNG Holdings Limited, which are equity method investees. The Alba Plant LLC processes the NGLs and then sells secondary condensate, propane, and butane at market prices. Marathon Oil includes its share of income from each of these equity method investees in the International E&P segment.
(e) Average of monthly prices obtained from Energy Information Administration (“EIA”) website.
(f) Settlement date average per mmbtu.
(g) Monthly pricing based upon average WTI adjusted for differentials unique to western Canada.
Media Relations Contacts: Lee Warren: 713-296-4103 Lisa Singhania: 713-296-4101 Investor Relations Contacts: Zach Dailey: 713-296-4140
The post Marathon Oil Reports Second Quarter 2016 Results appeared first on Investing News Network.